SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1907.04628

Polytopes, lattices, and spherical codes for the nearest neighbor problem

Abstract

We study locality-sensitive hash methods for the nearest neighbor problem for the angular distance, focusing on the approach of first projecting down onto a low-dimensional subspace, and then partitioning the projected vectors according to Voronoi cells induced by a suitable spherical code. This approach generalizes and interpolates between the fast but suboptimal hyperplane hashing of Charikar [STOC'02] and the asymptotically optimal but practically often slower hash families of Andoni-Indyk [FOCS'06], Andoni-Indyk-Nguyen-Razenshteyn [SODA'14] and Andoni-Indyk-Laarhoven-Razenshteyn-Schmidt [NIPS'15]. We set up a framework for analyzing the performance of any spherical code in this context, and we provide results for various codes from the literature, such as those related to regular polytopes and root lattices. Similar to hyperplane hashing, and unlike cross-polytope hashing, our analysis of collision probabilities and query exponents is exact and does not hide order terms which vanish only for large $d$, facilitating an easy parameter selection. For the two-dimensional case, we derive closed-form expressions for arbitrary spherical codes, and we show that the equilateral triangle is optimal, achieving a better performance than the two-dimensional analogues of hyperplane and cross-polytope hashing. In three and four dimensions, we numerically find that the tetrahedron, $5$-cell, and $16$-cell achieve the best query exponents, while in five or more dimensions orthoplices appear to outperform regular simplices, as well as the root lattice families $A_k$ and $D_k$. We argue that in higher dimensions, larger spherical codes will likely exist which will outperform orthoplices in theory, and we argue why using the $D_k$ root lattices will likely lead to better results in practice, due to a better trade-off between the asymptotic query exponent and the concrete costs of hashing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Thijs Laarhoven. 2019-07-10. Polytopes, lattices, and spherical codes for the nearest neighbor problem. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.icalp.2020.76

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS