Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1910.04974

A Quality Metric for Symmetric Graph Drawings

Amyra Meidiana·Seok-Hee Hong·Peter Eades·Daniel Keim
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Symmetry is an important aesthetic criteria in graph drawing and network visualisation. Symmetric graph drawings aim to faithfully represent automorphisms of graphs as geometric symmetries in a drawing. In this paper, we design and implement a framework for quality metrics that measure symmetry, that is, how faithfully a drawing of a graph displays automorphisms as geometric symmetries. The quality metrics are based on geometry (i.e. Euclidean distance) as well as mathematical group theory (i.e. orbits of automorphisms). More specifically, we define two varieties of symmetry quality metrics: (1) for displaying a single automorphism as a symmetry (axial or rotational) and (2) for displaying a group of automorphisms (cyclic or dihedral). We also present algorithms to compute the symmetric quality metrics in O(n log n) time for rotational symmetry and axial symmetry. We validate our symmetry quality metrics using deformation experiments. We then use the metrics to evaluate a number of established graph drawing layouts to compare how faithfully they display automorphisms of a graph as geometric symmetries.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Amyra Meidiana, Seok-Hee Hong, Peter Eades, Daniel Keim. 2019-10-11. A Quality Metric for Symmetric Graph Drawings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04974

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗