SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1911.02628

Distributed MST: A Smoothed Analysis

Abstract

We study smoothed analysis of distributed graph algorithms, focusing on the fundamental minimum spanning tree (MST) problem. With the goal of studying the time complexity of distributed MST as a function of the "perturbation" of the input graph, we posit a {\em smoothing model} that is parameterized by a smoothing parameter $0 \leq \epsilon(n) \leq 1$ which controls the amount of {\em random} edges that can be added to an input graph $G$ per round. Informally, $\epsilon(n)$ is the probability (typically a small function of $n$, e.g., $n^{-\frac{1}{4}}$) that a random edge can be added to a node per round. The added random edges, once they are added, can be used (only) for communication. We show upper and lower bounds on the time complexity of distributed MST in the above smoothing model. We present a distributed algorithm that, with high probability,\footnote{Throughout, with high probability (whp) means with probability at least $1 - n^{-c}$, for some fixed, positive constant $c$.} computes an MST and runs in $\tilde{O}(\min\{\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon(n)}} 2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}, D + \sqrt{n}\})$ rounds\footnote{The notation $\tilde{O}$ hides a $\polylog(n)$ factor and $\tilde{\Omega}$ hides a $\frac{1}{\polylog{(n)}}$ factor, where $n$ is the number of nodes of the graph.} where $\epsilon$ is the smoothing parameter, $D$ is the network diameter and $n$ is the network size. To complement our upper bound, we also show a lower bound of $\tilde{\Omega}(\min\{\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon(n)}}, D+\sqrt{n}\})$. We note that the upper and lower bounds essentially match except for a multiplicative $2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})} \polylog(n)$ factor. Our work can be considered as a first step in understanding the smoothed complexity of distributed graph algorithms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Soumyottam Chatterjee, Gopal Pandurangan, Nguyen Dinh Pham. 2019-11-06. Distributed MST: A Smoothed Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02628

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS