Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1912.10026

Calibration and reference simulations for the auditory periphery model of Verhulst et al. 2018 version 1.2

Alejandro Osses Vecchi·Sarah Verhulst
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This document describes a comprehensive procedure of how the biophysical model published by Verhulst et al. (2018) can be calibrated on the basis of reference auditory brainstem responses. Additionally, the filter design used in two of the model stages, cochlear nucleus (CN) and inferior colliculus (IC), is described in detail. These descriptions are valid for a new release of the Verhulst et al. model, version 1.2, as well as for previous versions of the model (version 1.1 or earlier). The differences between the model versions are explicitly mentioned and simulations to basic auditory stimuli are shown for model versions 1.1 and 1.2. In short, version 1.2 of the model includes a new implementation of the CN and IC stages (Stages 5 and 6). All previous model stages (Stages 1-4: outer and middle ear, transmission-line cochlear filter bank, inner hair cell model, and auditory nerve model) remained unchanged. In the new release (model version 1.2), in addition to the updated CN and IC stages, we employed a different calibration procedure to match human reference ABR amplitudes of waves I, III, and V more faithfully. This release note shows the implications of these model adjustments on the simulations presented in the original 2018 model paper. For this purpose, results from two model versions are reported: (1) New model release (version 1.2), labelled as model v1.2; and (2) Previous model release as used by Verhulst et al., labelled as model v1.1. The main difference between IC model stages relates to the degree of IC inhibition that was applied, with more inhibition in v1.2 than implemented in v1.1. The time domain simulations presented in this document show that this change in inhibition strength does not drastically change the results presented in the original paper. However, v1.2 more correctly captures the physiologically derived CN and IC inhibition/excitation strengths.

Explore related subjects

eess.AScs.SD

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alejandro Osses Vecchi, Sarah Verhulst. 2019-12-21. Calibration and reference simulations for the auditory periphery model of Verhulst et al. 2018 version 1.2. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.10026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Diarization Error Decomposition Under Pause Annotation Ambiguity

Speaker diarization evaluation is sensitive to ambiguity in pause annotation, which can inflate diarization error rate (DER) or obscure genuine model errors. We show that morphological closing, which has been used for pause-tolerant diarization evaluation, discards segment-level distinctions. Instead, we propose an exact, overlap-aware decomposition of standard DER into a pause-attributable component, consisting of errors compatible with pause filling, and a residual core component that can serve as a proxy for intrinsic diarization errors. The decomposition leaves DER unchanged, while the pause-attributable and core components vary monotonically with the pause threshold and eventually saturate. Experiments spanning synthetic transformations, annotation mismatch, cross-domain evaluation, and tight-boundary diarization show that the decomposition reveals error sources not apparent from standard DER.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Less can be More: What Aspects of Speech Drive End-of-Turn Detection

In conversational AI, detecting when a speaker has finished talking is crucial for natural turn taking. While recent work incorporates semantics, the relative contribution of different modalities remains unclear. We present a controlled ablation of acoustic, prosodic, and semantic signals for streaming end of turn detection using a lightweight trimodal classifier. Under identical training conditions, the acoustic prosodic combination achieves the best balance of accuracy and latency, achieving utterance F1 of 0.93 with 7.8% false alarms at 400ms median latency. Adding text increases premature detections without improving performance. Feature space analysis confirms that prosodic features have the strongest class separability, while text representations overlap substantially. These findings suggest that turn-taking is primarily conveyed through intonation and silence patterns rather than semantic completeness, enabling faster and more reliable systems without expensive text inference.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Downstream-Task-Aware Unified Source Separation

Task-aware unified source separation (TUSS) enables a single model to handle diverse separation tasks by conditioning on input prompts. However, conventional TUSS does not account for downstream task requirements, such as whether the enhanced speech will be used for human listening or automatic speech recognition (ASR). In this paper, we propose a prompt extension framework for TUSS that incorporates downstream task information into the input prompts and switches the loss function according to the given prompt during training, enabling outputs with different signal characteristics at inference time. Specifically, we introduce an ASR-dedicated prompt paired with a regularized loss function that reduces speech artifacts to improve ASR robustness, while the standard prompt is paired with the conventional SNR loss function. Experiments on the LibriSpeech and JNAS corpora demonstrate that the proposed joint-training scheme enables a single model to improve ASR performance over noisy input across a wide range of SNR conditions by selecting the ASR-dedicated prompt, while maintaining general speech enhancement quality when the standard prompt is used.

eess.AS↗