SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2002.11830

Polynomial algorithms for p-dispersion problems in a planar Pareto Front

Abstract

In this paper, p-dispersion problems are studied to select $p\geqslant 2$ representative points from a large 2D Pareto Front (PF), solution of bi-objective optimization. Four standard p-dispersion variants are considered. A novel variant, Max-Sum-Neighbor p-dispersion, is introduced for the specific case of a 2D PF. Firstly, $2$-dispersion and $3$-dispersion problems are proven solvable in $O(n)$ time in a 2D PF. Secondly, dynamic programming algorithms are designed for three p-dispersion variants, proving polynomial complexities in a 2D PF. Max-min p-dispersion is solvable in $O(pn\log n)$ time and $O(n)$ memory space. Max-Sum-Neighbor p-dispersion is proven solvable in $O(pn^2)$ time and{$O(n)$} space. Max-Sum-min p-dispersion is solvable in $O(pn^3)$ time and $O(pn^2)$ space, this complexity holds also in 1D, proving for the first time that Max-Sum-min p-dispersion is polynomial in 1D. Furthermore, properties of these algorithms are discussed for an efficient implementation {and for a practical application inside bi-objective meta-heuristics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nicolas Dupin. 2020-02-26. Polynomial algorithms for p-dispersion problems in a planar Pareto Front. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2023034

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS