SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2004.02081

Achieving Zero Asymptotic Queueing Delay for Parallel Jobs

Abstract

Zero queueing delay is highly desirable in large-scale computing systems. Existing work has shown that it can be asymptotically achieved by using the celebrated Power-of-$d$-choices (pod) policy with a probe overhead $d = \omega\left(\frac{\log N}{1-\lambda}\right)$, and it is impossible when $d = O\left(\frac{1}{1-\lambda}\right)$, where $N$ is the number of servers and $\lambda$ is the load of the system. However, these results are based on the model where each job is an indivisible unit, which does not capture the parallel structure of jobs in today's predominant parallel computing paradigm. This paper thus considers a model where each job consists of a batch of parallel tasks. Under this model, we propose a new notion of zero (asymptotic) queueing delay that requires the job delay under a policy to approach the job delay given by the max of its tasks' service times, i.e., the job delay assuming its tasks entered service right upon arrival. This notion quantifies the effect of queueing on a job level for jobs consisting of multiple tasks, and thus deviates from the conventional zero queueing delay for single-task jobs in the literature. We show that zero queueing delay for parallel jobs can be achieved using the batch-filling policy (a variant of the celebrated pod policy) with a probe overhead $d = \omega\left(\frac{1}{(1-\lambda)\log k}\right)$ in the sub-Halfin-Whitt heavy-traffic regime, where $k$ is the number of tasks in each job { and $k$ properly scales with $N$ (the number of servers)}. This result demonstrates that for parallel jobs, zero queueing delay can be achieved with a smaller probe overhead. We also establish an impossibility result: we show that zero queueing delay cannot be achieved if $d = \exp\left({o\left(\frac{\log N}{\log k}\right)}\right)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wentao Weng, Weina Wang. 2020-04-05. Achieving Zero Asymptotic Queueing Delay for Parallel Jobs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.02081

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

PASCAL: A Phase-Aware Shared-Cache Model for Parallel Scans

In modern AI Accelerators and GPGPUs, many concurrent cores repeatedly access the same shared data. This pattern occurs in attention, where different query tiles share the same K/V block, GEMM, where every tile in a row reads the same panel, and many other operators. We name this pattern parallel scan. Due to a significant amount of data reuse in this pattern, the cache is expected to capture as much data reuse as possible and largely reduce requests sent to the main memory for both performance and energy consumption concerns. However, in reality, because of the intrinsic asynchrony of multi-cores, the actual cache miss rate and DRAM traffic can be much higher compared to ideal cases. In this paper, we propose PASCAL, a shared-cache model for parallel scans. It is aware of the dynamic feature of progress divergence across multi-cores, correlate the divergence with the combination of different factors such as occupancy, and predicts the cache miss rate before execution. Because prediction needs no target trace, timing, or counters, PASCAL supports design-space exploration at scales where cycle-accurate simulation is impractical, and its policy-independent bound states how much traffic no replacement policy can avoid. A MAPE of 13.84% is achieved in a 60-configuration dataset with various software pipeline depths, occupancies, and memory access data paths on an NVIDIA GB10 GPU, against 44.79% for physical-wave TileSight and 54.16% for exact symbolic SDCM.

cs.PF

Mathematical Modeling of a Cognitive Continuum Digital Shadow for Large-Scale, Cross-Facility Workflows

We present the mathematical foundations of a \emph{Cognitive Continuum Digital Shadow} (CCDS), a decision-support layer between users and the cross-facility infrastructure---instruments, networks, data stores and compute centers---of exascale and post-exascale scientific workflows. The CCDS couples a state-space representation of the continuum with multistage stochastic programming, so that deployment scenarios can be explored and optimized \emph{before} jobs are launched. This allows operators and users to quantify the cost, makespan and energy trade-offs of a workflow under uncertain resource availability, and hedge their decisions accordingly. We formulate the underlying optimization as a multimode, resource-constrained, stochastic supply-chain network design problem and demonstrate it on a realistic genomics workflow scheduled across heterogeneous HPC and data-center resources. This is the first of three papers; the second treats the underlying software architecture and the third reports large-scale use-cases.

cs.PF

RGB Input Pipelines: Throughput, GPU Memory, and Transformation Coverage

An image-augmentation pipeline must deliver a complete batch before a model can use it. We compare seven input paths from five libraries, starting with RGB JPEG files and ending with a synchronized CUDA float16 batch. We manually matched transformation recipes and parameters across libraries to make the workloads as comparable as possible. The experiment uses 57 selected recipes, a batch size of 256, and one NVIDIA L4 machine. Throughput and peak process GPU memory are recorded together in 759 measurements. On the 11 recipes shared by all paths, DALI and AlbumentationsX have median throughputs of 5,029 and 4,679 images/s, with median peak GPU memory of 2,086 and 1,852 MiB. Broader pairwise comparisons favor AlbumentationsX on 26/26 TorchVision recipes, 50/51 Kornia recipes, and 25/26 Pillow recipes. DALI is faster than AlbumentationsX on all 22 shared recipes, with a median throughput ratio of 1.18x. A separate census reports coverage of the 118 entries in a selected AlbumentationsX RGB catalog. The study measures input preparation at fixed settings; it does not measure model training, numerical equivalence, or the best attainable configuration of each library. Benchmark code: https://github.com/albumentations-team/benchmark.

cs.PF