arXiv · 2004.06045
On Empirical Equivalence and Duality
Abstract
I argue that, on a judicious reading of two existing criteria--one syntactic and the other semantic--dual theories can be taken to be empirically equivalent. The judicious reading is straightforward, but leads to the surprising conclusion that very different-looking theories can have equivalent empirical content. And thus it shows how a widespread scientific practice, of interpreting duals as empirically equivalent, can be understood by a thus-far unnoticed feature of existing accounts of empirical equivalence.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Sebastian De Haro. 2020-04-13. On Empirical Equivalence and Duality. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51197-5_3
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.