SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2007.09816

The Energy Complexity of BFS in Radio Networks

Abstract

We consider a model of energy complexity in Radio Networks in which transmitting or listening on the channel costs one unit of energy and computation is free. This simplified model captures key aspects of battery-powered sensors: that battery life is most influenced by transceiver usage, and that at low transmission powers, the actual cost of transmitting and listening are very similar. The energy complexity of tasks in single-hop networks is well understood. Recent work of Chang et al. considered energy complexity in multi-hop networks and showed that $\mathsf{Broadcast}$ admits an energy-efficient protocol, by which we mean each of the $n$ nodes in the network spends $O(\text{polylog}(n))$ energy. This work left open the strange possibility that all natural problems in multi-hop networks might admit such an energy-efficient solution. In this paper we prove that the landscape of energy complexity is rich enough to support a multitude of problem complexities. Whereas $\mathsf{Broadcast}$ can be solved by an energy-efficient protocol, exact computation of $\mathsf{Diameter}$ cannot, requiring $\Omega(n)$ energy. Our main result is that $\mathsf{Breadth First Search}$ has sub-polynomial energy complexity at most $2^{O(\sqrt{\log n\log\log n})}=n^{o(1)}$; whether it admits an efficient $O(\text{polylog}(n))$-energy protocol is an open problem. Our main algorithm involves recursively solving a generalized BFS problem on a cluster graph introduced by Miller, Peng, and Xu. In this application, we make crucial use of a close relationship between distances in this cluster graph, and distances in the original network. This relationship is new and may be of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yi-Jun Chang, Varsha Dani, Thomas P. Hayes, Seth Pettie. 2020-07-19. The Energy Complexity of BFS in Radio Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09816

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS