arXiv · 2007.14351
Autosegmental Neural Nets: Should Phones and Tones be Synchronous or Asynchronous?
Abstract
Phones, the segmental units of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), are used for lexical distinctions in most human languages; Tones, the suprasegmental units of the IPA, are used in perhaps 70%. Many previous studies have explored cross-lingual adaptation of automatic speech recognition (ASR) phone models, but few have explored the multilingual and cross-lingual transfer of synchronization between phones and tones. In this paper, we test four Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC)-based acoustic models, differing in the degree of synchrony they impose between phones and tones. Models are trained and tested multilingually in three languages, then adapted and tested cross-lingually in a fourth. Both synchronous and asynchronous models are effective in both multilingual and cross-lingual settings. Synchronous models achieve lower error rate in the joint phone+tone tier, but asynchronous training results in lower tone error rate.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Jialu Li, Mark Hasegawa-Johnson. 2020-07-28. Autosegmental Neural Nets: Should Phones and Tones be Synchronous or Asynchronous?. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2020-1834
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.