SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2008.00589

Finding Closed Quasigeodesics on Convex Polyhedra

Abstract

A closed quasigeodesic is a closed curve on the surface of a polyhedron with at most $180^\circ$ of surface on both sides at all points; such curves can be locally unfolded straight. In 1949, Pogorelov proved that every convex polyhedron has at least three (non-self-intersecting) closed quasigeodesics, but the proof relies on a nonconstructive topological argument. We present the first finite algorithm to find a closed quasigeodesic on a given convex polyhedron, which is the first positive progress on a 1990 open problem by O'Rourke and Wyman. The algorithm also establishes a pseudopolynomial upper bound on the total number of visits to faces (number of line segments), namely, $O\left(\frac{n \, L^2}{\epsilon^2 \, \ell^2}\right)$ where $n$ is the number of vertices of the polyhedron, $\epsilon$ is the minimum curvature of a vertex, $L$ is the length of the longest edge, and $\ell$ is the smallest distance within a face between a vertex and a nonincident edge (minimum feature size of any face). On the real RAM, the algorithm's running time is also pseudopolynomial, namely $O\left(\frac{L^2}{\epsilon^2 \, \ell^2} \, n \lg n\right)$. On a word RAM, the running time grows to $O\left(\frac{b^2 \, \Delta^{36} \, L^{146}}{\epsilon^{98} \, \ell^{146}} \, n \lg n \cdot 2^{O(|R|)}\right)$, where $\Delta \leq n$ is the polyhedron's maximum vertex degree, assuming the polyhedron's intrinsic geometry is given by constant-size radical expressions with $b$-bit integers and at most $|R|$ distinct square-roots. Along the way, we introduce the expression RAM model of computation, formalizing a connection between the real RAM and word RAM hinted at by past work on exact geometric computation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Erik D. Demaine, Adam C. Hesterberg, Jason S. Ku. 2020-08-03. Finding Closed Quasigeodesics on Convex Polyhedra. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.00589

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG