SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2008.02060

A Note on a Recent Algorithm for Minimum Cut

Abstract

Given an undirected edge-weighted graph $G=(V,E)$ with $m$ edges and $n$ vertices, the minimum cut problem asks to find a subset of vertices $S$ such that the total weight of all edges between $S$ and $V \setminus S$ is minimized. Karger's longstanding $O(m \log^3 n)$ time randomized algorithm for this problem was very recently improved in two independent works to $O(m \log^2 n)$ [ICALP'20] and to $O(m \log^2 n + n\log^5 n)$ [STOC'20]. These two algorithms use different approaches and techniques. In particular, while the former is faster, the latter has the advantage that it can be used to obtain efficient algorithms in the cut-query and in the streaming models of computation. In this paper, we show how to simplify and improve the algorithm of [STOC'20] to $O(m \log^2 n + n\log^3 n)$. We obtain this by replacing a randomized algorithm that, given a spanning tree $T$ of $G$, finds in $O(m \log n+n\log^4 n)$ time a minimum cut of $G$ that 2-respects (cuts two edges of) $T$ with a simple $O(m \log n+n\log^2 n)$ time deterministic algorithm for the same problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Paweł Gawrychowski, Shay Mozes, Oren Weimann. 2020-08-05. A Note on a Recent Algorithm for Minimum Cut. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.02060

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS