SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2009.08830

Efficient Constant-Factor Approximate Enumeration of Minimal Subsets for Monotone Properties with Weight Constraints

Abstract

A property $\Pi$ on a finite set $U$ is \emph{monotone} if for every $X \subseteq U$ satisfying $\Pi$, every superset $Y \subseteq U$ of $X$ also satisfies $\Pi$. Many combinatorial properties can be seen as monotone properties. The problem of finding a minimum subset of $U$ satisfying $\Pi$ is a central problem in combinatorial optimization. Although many approximate/exact algorithms have been developed to solve this kind of problem on numerous properties, a solution obtained by these algorithms is often unsuitable for real-world applications due to the difficulty of building accurate mathematical models on real-world problems. A promising approach to overcome this difficulty is to \emph{enumerate} multiple small solutions rather than to \emph{find} a single small solution. To this end, given a weight function $w: U \to \mathbb N$ and an integer $k$, we devise algorithms that \emph{approximately} enumerate all minimal subsets of $U$ with weight at most $k$ satisfying $\Pi$ for various monotone properties $\Pi$, where "approximate enumeration" means that algorithms output all minimal subsets satisfying $\Pi$ whose weight at most $k$ and may output some minimal subsets satisfying $\Pi$ whose weight exceeds $k$ but is at most $ck$ for some constant $c \ge 1$. These algorithms allow us to efficiently enumerate minimal vertex covers, minimal dominating sets in bounded degree graphs, minimal feedback vertex sets, minimal hitting sets in bounded rank hypergraphs, etc., of weight at most $k$ with constant approximation factors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yasuaki Kobayashi, Kazuhiro Kurita, Kunihiro Wasa. 2020-09-18. Efficient Constant-Factor Approximate Enumeration of Minimal Subsets for Monotone Properties with Weight Constraints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.08830

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS