Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2010.03870

Improved approximation ratios for two Euclidean maximum spanning tree problems

Ahmad Biniaz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the following two maximization problems related to spanning trees in the Euclidean plane. It is not known whether or not these problems are NP-hard. We present approximation algorithms with better approximation ratios for both problems. The improved ratios are obtained mainly by employing the Steiner ratio, which has not been used in this context earlier. (i) Longest noncrossing spanning tree: Given a set of points in the plane, the goal is to find a maximum-length noncrossing spanning tree. Alon, Rajagopalan, and Suri (SoCG 1993) studied this problem for the first time and gave a $0.5$-approximation algorithm. Over the years, the approximation ratio has been successively improved to $0.502$, $0.503$, and to $0.512$ which is the current best ratio, due to Cabello et al.. We revisit this problem and improve the ratio further to $0.519$. The improvement is achieved by a collection of ideas, some from previous works and some new ideas (including the use of the Steiner ratio), along with a more refined analysis. (ii) Longest spanning tree with neighborhoods: Given a collection of regions (neighborhoods) in the plane, the goal is to select a point in each neighborhood so that the longest spanning tree on selected points has maximum length. We present an algorithm with approximation ratio $0.524$ for this problem. The previous best ratio, due to Chen and Dumitrescu, is $0.511$ which is in turn the first improvement beyond the trivial ratio $0.5$. Our algorithm is fairly simple, its analysis is relatively short, and it takes linear time after computing a diametral pair of points. The simplicity comes from the fact that our solution belongs to a set containing three stars and one double-star. The shortness and the improvement come from the use of the Steiner ratio.

Explore related subjects

cs.CG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ahmad Biniaz. 2020-10-08. Improved approximation ratios for two Euclidean maximum spanning tree problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03870

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG↗