SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2010.15814

Around the diameter of AT-free graphs

Abstract

A graph algorithm is truly subquadratic if it runs in ${\cal O}(m^b)$ time on connected $m$-edge graphs, for some positive $b < 2$. Roditty and Vassilevska Williams (STOC'13) proved that under plausible complexity assumptions, there is no truly subquadratic algorithm for computing the diameter of general graphs. In this work, we present positive and negative results on the existence of such algorithms for computing the diameter on some special graph classes. Specifically, three vertices in a graph form an asteroidal triple (AT) if between any two of them there exists a path that avoids the closed neighbourhood of the third one. We call a graph AT-free if it does not contain an AT. We first prove that for all $m$-edge AT-free graphs, one can compute all the eccentricities in truly subquadratic ${\cal O}(m^{3/2})$ time. Then, we extend our study to several subclasses of chordal graphs -- all of them generalizing interval graphs in various ways --, as an attempt to understand which of the properties of AT-free graphs, or natural generalizations of the latter, can help in the design of fast algorithms for the diameter problem on broader graph classes. For instance, for all chordal graphs with a dominating shortest path, there is a linear-time algorithm for computing a diametral pair if the diameter is at least four. However, already for split graphs with a dominating edge, under plausible complexity assumptions, there is no truly subquadratic algorithm for deciding whether the diameter is either $2$ or $3$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Guillaume Ducoffe. 2020-10-29. Around the diameter of AT-free graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.15814

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS