arXiv · 2104.12918
Extractive and Abstractive Explanations for Fact-Checking and Evaluation of News
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the construction of natural language explanations for news claims, with the goal of assisting fact-checking and news evaluation applications. We experiment with two methods: (1) an extractive method based on Biased TextRank -- a resource-effective unsupervised graph-based algorithm for content extraction; and (2) an abstractive method based on the GPT-2 language model. We perform comparative evaluations on two misinformation datasets in the political and health news domains, and find that the extractive method shows the most promise.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Ashkan Kazemi, Zehua Li, Verónica Pérez-Rosas, Rada Mihalcea. 2021-04-27. Extractive and Abstractive Explanations for Fact-Checking and Evaluation of News. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12918
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.