SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2104.14680

Algorithms for the Line-Constrained Disk Coverage and Related Problems

Abstract

Given a set $P$ of $n$ points and a set $S$ of $m$ weighted disks in the plane, the disk coverage problem asks for a subset of disks of minimum total weight that cover all points of $P$. The problem is NP-hard. In this paper, we consider a line-constrained version in which all disks are centered on a line $L$ (while points of $P$ can be anywhere in the plane). We present an $O((m+n)\log(m+n)+\kappa\log m)$ time algorithm for the problem, where $\kappa$ is the number of pairs of disks that intersect. Alternatively, we can also solve the problem in $O(nm\log(m+n))$ time. For the unit-disk case where all disks have the same radius, the running time can be reduced to $O((n+m)\log(m+n))$. In addition, we solve in $O((m+n)\log(m+n))$ time the $L_{\infty}$ and $L_1$ cases of the problem, in which the disks are squares and diamonds, respectively. As a by-product, the 1D version of the problem where all points of $P$ are on $L$ and the disks are line segments on $L$ is also solved in $O((m+n)\log(m+n))$ time. We also show that the problem has an $\Omega((m+n)\log (m+n))$ time lower bound even for the 1D case. We further demonstrate that our techniques can also be used to solve other geometric coverage problems. For example, given in the plane a set $P$ of $n$ points and a set $S$ of $n$ weighted half-planes, we solve in $O(n^4\log n)$ time the problem of finding a subset of half-planes to cover $P$ so that their total weight is minimized. This improves the previous best algorithm of $O(n^5)$ time by almost a linear factor. If all half-planes are lower ones, then our algorithm runs in $O(n^2\log n)$ time, which improves the previous best algorithm of $O(n^4)$ time by almost a quadratic factor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Logan Pedersen, Haitao Wang. 2021-04-29. Algorithms for the Line-Constrained Disk Coverage and Related Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14680

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG