SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2105.09217

Approximation Algorithms For The Euclidean Dispersion Problems

Abstract

In this article, we consider the Euclidean dispersion problems. Let $P=\{p_{1}, p_{2}, \ldots, p_{n}\}$ be a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^2$. For each point $p \in P$ and $S \subseteq P$, we define $cost_{\gamma}(p,S)$ as the sum of Euclidean distance from $p$ to the nearest $\gamma $ point in $S \setminus \{p\}$. We define $cost_{\gamma}(S)=\min_{p \in S}\{cost_{\gamma}(p,S)\}$ for $S \subseteq P$. In the $\gamma$-dispersion problem, a set $P$ of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and a positive integer $k \in [\gamma+1,n]$ are given. The objective is to find a subset $S\subseteq P$ of size $k$ such that $cost_{\gamma}(S)$ is maximized. We consider both $2$-dispersion and $1$-dispersion problem in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Along with these, we also consider $2$-dispersion problem when points are placed on a line. In this paper, we propose a simple polynomial time $(2\sqrt 3 + \epsilon )$-factor approximation algorithm for the $2$-dispersion problem, for any $\epsilon > 0$, which is an improvement over the best known approximation factor $4\sqrt3$ [Amano, K. and Nakano, S. I., An approximation algorithm for the $2$-dispersion problem, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Vol. 103(3), pp. 506-508, 2020]. Next, we develop a common framework for designing an approximation algorithm for the Euclidean dispersion problem. With this common framework, we improve the approximation factor to $2\sqrt 3$ for the $2$-dispersion problem in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Using the same framework, we propose a polynomial time algorithm, which returns an optimal solution for the $2$-dispersion problem when points are placed on a line. Moreover, to show the effectiveness of the framework, we also propose a $2$-factor approximation algorithm for the $1$-dispersion problem in $\mathbb{R}^2$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pawan K. Mishra, Gautam K. Das. 2021-05-19. Approximation Algorithms For The Euclidean Dispersion Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.09217

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG