Near-Optimal Algorithms for Linear Algebra in the Current Matrix Multiplication Time

Nadiia Chepurko; Kenneth L. Clarkson; Praneeth Kacham; David P. Woodruff

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2107.08090

Near-Optimal Algorithms for Linear Algebra in the Current Matrix Multiplication Time

Nadiia Chepurko·Kenneth L. Clarkson·Praneeth Kacham·David P. Woodruff

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the numerical linear algebra community, it was suggested that to obtain nearly optimal bounds for various problems such as rank computation, finding a maximal linearly independent subset of columns (a basis), regression, or low-rank approximation, a natural way would be to resolve the main open question of Nelson and Nguyen (FOCS, 2013). This question is regarding the logarithmic factors in the sketching dimension of existing oblivious subspace embeddings that achieve constant-factor approximation. We show how to bypass this question using a refined sketching technique, and obtain optimal or nearly optimal bounds for these problems. A key technique we use is an explicit mapping of Indyk based on uncertainty principles and extractors, which after first applying known oblivious subspace embeddings, allows us to quickly spread out the mass of the vector so that sampling is now effective. We thereby avoid a logarithmic factor in the sketching dimension that is standard in bounds proven using the matrix Chernoff inequality. For the fundamental problems of rank computation and finding a basis, our algorithms improve Cheung, Kwok, and Lau (JACM, 2013), and are optimal to within a constant factor and a poly(log log(n))-factor, respectively. Further, for constant-factor regression and low-rank approximation we give the first optimal algorithms, for the current matrix multiplication exponent.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Nadiia Chepurko, Kenneth L. Clarkson, Praneeth Kacham, David P. Woodruff. 2021-07-16. Near-Optimal Algorithms for Linear Algebra in the Current Matrix Multiplication Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.08090

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗