Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2107.10045

A Tandem Framework Balancing Privacy and Security for Voice User Interfaces

Ranya Aloufi·Hamed Haddadi·David Boyle
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Speech synthesis, voice cloning, and voice conversion techniques present severe privacy and security threats to users of voice user interfaces (VUIs). These techniques transform one or more elements of a speech signal, e.g., identity and emotion, while preserving linguistic information. Adversaries may use advanced transformation tools to trigger a spoofing attack using fraudulent biometrics for a legitimate speaker. Conversely, such techniques have been used to generate privacy-transformed speech by suppressing personally identifiable attributes in the voice signals, achieving anonymization. Prior works have studied the security and privacy vectors in parallel, and thus it raises alarm that if a benign user can achieve privacy by a transformation, it also means that a malicious user can break security by bypassing the anti-spoofing mechanism. In this paper, we take a step towards balancing two seemingly conflicting requirements: security and privacy. It remains unclear what the vulnerabilities in one domain imply for the other, and what dynamic interactions exist between them. A better understanding of these aspects is crucial for assessing and mitigating vulnerabilities inherent with VUIs and building effective defenses. In this paper,(i) we investigate the applicability of the current voice anonymization methods by deploying a tandem framework that jointly combines anti-spoofing and authentication models, and evaluate the performance of these methods;(ii) examining analytical and empirical evidence, we reveal a duality between the two mechanisms as they offer different ways to achieve the same objective, and we show that leveraging one vector significantly amplifies the effectiveness of the other;(iii) we demonstrate that to effectively defend from potential attacks against VUIs, it is necessary to investigate the attacks from multiple complementary perspectives(security and privacy).

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.SDeess.AS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ranya Aloufi, Hamed Haddadi, David Boyle. 2021-07-21. A Tandem Framework Balancing Privacy and Security for Voice User Interfaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10045

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗