Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2108.05714

The Banach-Tarski Paradox

Katie Buchhorn
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 1924, S. Banach and A. Tarski proved an astonishing, yet rather counterintuitive paradox: given a solid ball in $\mathbb{R}^3$, it is possible to partition it into finitely many pieces and reassemble them to form two solid balls, each identical in size to the first. When this paradox is applied to 3-dimensional space it does go against our intuition, but very often our intuition is flawed. The aim of the paper is to provide a comprehensive proof of the Banach-Tarski paradox, expanding in between the lines of the original volume. We explore the notions of paradoxical and equidecomposable sets which are phrased in terms of group actions. Finally, provided we have the Axiom of Choice at our disposal, we can construct sets that are nonmeasurable (not Lebesgue measurable) and the proof of the Banach-Tarski Paradox follows naturally.

Explore related subjects

math.HOmath.FAmath.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Katie Buchhorn. 2021-08-08. The Banach-Tarski Paradox. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05714

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗