SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2109.01080

Optimization and Sampling Under Continuous Symmetry: Examples and Lie Theory

Abstract

In the last few years, the notion of symmetry has provided a powerful and essential lens to view several optimization or sampling problems that arise in areas such as theoretical computer science, statistics, machine learning, quantum inference, and privacy. Here, we present two examples of nonconvex problems in optimization and sampling where continuous symmetries play -- implicitly or explicitly -- a key role in the development of efficient algorithms. These examples rely on deep and hidden connections between nonconvex symmetric manifolds and convex polytopes, and are heavily generalizable. To formulate and understand these generalizations, we then present an introduction to Lie theory -- an indispensable mathematical toolkit for capturing and working with continuous symmetries. We first present the basics of Lie groups, Lie algebras, and the adjoint actions associated with them, and we also mention the classification theorem for Lie algebras. Subsequently, we present Kostant's convexity theorem and show how it allows us to reduce linear optimization problems over orbits of Lie groups to linear optimization problems over polytopes. Finally, we present the Harish-Chandra and the Harish-Chandra--Itzykson--Zuber (HCIZ) formulas, which convert partition functions (integrals) over Lie groups into sums over the corresponding (discrete) Weyl groups, enabling efficient sampling algorithms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jonathan Leake, Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. 2021-09-02. Optimization and Sampling Under Continuous Symmetry: Examples and Lie Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.01080

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS