Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2109.12069

Towards a Paradigmatic Shift in Pre-election Polling Adequately Including Still Undecided Voters -- Some Ideas Based on Set-Valued Data for the 2021 German Federal Election

Dominik Kreiss·Thomas Augustin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Within this paper we develop and apply new methodology adequately including undecided voters for the 2021 German federal election. Due to a cooperation with the polling institute Civey, we are in the fortunate position to obtain data in which undecided voters can state all the options they are still pondering between. In contrast to conventional polls, forcing the undecided to either state a single party or to drop out, this design allows the undecided to provide their current position in an accurate and precise way. The resulting set-valued information can be used to examine structural properties of groups undecided between specific parties as well as to improve election forecasting. For forecasting, this partial information provides valuable additional knowledge, and the uncertainty induced by the participants' ambiguity can be conveyed within interval-valued results. Turning to coalitions of parties, which is in the core of the current public discussion in Germany, some of this uncertainty can be dissolved as the undecided provide precise information on corresponding coalitions. We show structural differences between the decided and undecided with discrete choice models as well as elaborate the discrepancy between the conventional approach and our new ones including the undecided. Our cautious analysis further demonstrates that in most cases the undecideds' eventual decisions are pivotal which coalitions could hold a majority of seats. Overall, accounting for the populations' ambiguity leads to more credible results and paints a more holistic picture of the political landscape, pathing the way for a possible paradigmatic shift concerning the adequate inclusion of undecided voters in pre-election polls.

Explore related subjects

stat.MEstat.AP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dominik Kreiss, Thomas Augustin. 2021-09-24. Towards a Paradigmatic Shift in Pre-election Polling Adequately Including Still Undecided Voters -- Some Ideas Based on Set-Valued Data for the 2021 German Federal Election. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗