SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2109.13302

Clustering with Neighborhoods

Abstract

In the standard planar $k$-center clustering problem, one is given a set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane, and the goal is to select $k$ center points, so as to minimize the maximum distance over points in $P$ to their nearest center. Here we initiate the systematic study of the clustering with neighborhoods problem, which generalizes the $k$-center problem to allow the covered objects to be a set of general disjoint convex objects $\mathscr{C}$ rather than just a point set $P$. For this problem we first show that there is a PTAS for approximating the number of centers. Specifically, if $r_{opt}$ is the optimal radius for $k$ centers, then in $n^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)}$ time we can produce a set of $(1+\varepsilon)k$ centers with radius $\leq r_{opt}$. If instead one considers the standard goal of approximating the optimal clustering radius, while keeping $k$ as a hard constraint, we show that the radius cannot be approximated within any factor in polynomial time unless $\mathsf{P=NP}$, even when $\mathscr{C}$ is a set of line segments. When $\mathscr{C}$ is a set of unit disks we show the problem is hard to approximate within a factor of $\frac{\sqrt{13}-\sqrt{3}}{2-\sqrt{3}}\approx 6.99$. This hardness result complements our main result, where we show that when the objects are disks, of possibly differing radii, there is a $(5+2\sqrt{3})\approx 8.46$ approximation algorithm. Additionally, for unit disks we give an $O(n\log k)+(k/\varepsilon)^{O(k)}$ time $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation to the optimal radius, that is, an FPTAS for constant $k$ whose running time depends only linearly on $n$. Finally, we show that the one dimensional version of the problem, even when intersections are allowed, can be solved exactly in $O(n\log n)$ time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hongyao Huang, Georgiy Klimenko, Benjamin Raichel. 2021-09-27. Clustering with Neighborhoods. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.13302

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG