arXiv · 2110.05213
It is Not as Good as You Think! Evaluating Simultaneous Machine Translation on Interpretation Data
Abstract
Most existing simultaneous machine translation (SiMT) systems are trained and evaluated on offline translation corpora. We argue that SiMT systems should be trained and tested on real interpretation data. To illustrate this argument, we propose an interpretation test set and conduct a realistic evaluation of SiMT trained on offline translations. Our results, on our test set along with 3 existing smaller scale language pairs, highlight the difference of up-to 13.83 BLEU score when SiMT models are evaluated on translation vs interpretation data. In the absence of interpretation training data, we propose a translation-to-interpretation (T2I) style transfer method which allows converting existing offline translations into interpretation-style data, leading to up-to 2.8 BLEU improvement. However, the evaluation gap remains notable, calling for constructing large-scale interpretation corpora better suited for evaluating and developing SiMT systems.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Jinming Zhao, Philip Arthur, Gholamreza Haffari, Trevor Cohn, Ehsan Shareghi. 2021-10-11. It is Not as Good as You Think! Evaluating Simultaneous Machine Translation on Interpretation Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05213
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.