SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2112.05083

Improved approximation algorithms for two Euclidean k-Center variants

Abstract

The $k$-Center problem is one of the most popular clustering problems. After decades of work, the complexity of most of its variants on general metrics is now well understood. Surprisingly, this is not the case for a natural setting that often arises in practice, namely the Euclidean setting, in which the input points are points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, and the distance between them is the standard $\ell_2$ Euclidean distance. In this work, we study two Euclidean $k$-Center variants, the Matroid Center problem on the real line and the Robust Euclidean $k$-Supplier problem, and provide algorithms that improve upon the best approximation guarantees known for these problems. In particular, we present a simple $2.5$-approximation algorithm for the Matroid Center problem on the real line, thus improving upon the $3$-approximation factor algorithm of Chen, Li, Liang, and Wang (2016) that works for general metrics. Moreover, we present a $(1 + \sqrt{3})$-approximation algorithm for the Robust Euclidean $k$-Supplier problem, thus improving upon the state-of-the-art $3$-approximation algorithm for Robust $k$-Supplier on general metrics and matching the best approximation factor known for the non-robust setting by Nagarajan, Schieber and Shachnai (2020).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Haris Angelidakis, Ivan Sergeev, Pontus Westermark. 2021-12-09. Improved approximation algorithms for two Euclidean k-Center variants. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05083

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS