SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2112.06319

On sketching approximations for symmetric Boolean CSPs

Abstract

A Boolean maximum constraint satisfaction problem, Max-CSP($f$), is specified by a predicate $f:\{-1,1\}^k\to\{0,1\}$. An $n$-variable instance of Max-CSP($f$) consists of a list of constraints, each of which applies $f$ to $k$ distinct literals drawn from the $n$ variables. For $k=2$, Chou, Golovnev, and Velusamy [CGV20, FOCS 2020] obtained explicit ratios characterizing the $\sqrt n$-space streaming approximability of every predicate. For $k \geq 3$, Chou, Golovnev, Sudan, and Velusamy [CGSV21, arXiv:2102.12351] proved a general dichotomy theorem for $\sqrt n$-space sketching algorithms: For every $f$, there exists $\alpha(f)\in (0,1]$ such that for every $\epsilon>0$, Max-CSP($f$) is $(\alpha(f)-\epsilon)$-approximable by an $O(\log n)$-space linear sketching algorithm, but $(\alpha(f)+\epsilon)$-approximation sketching algorithms require $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ space. In this work, we give closed-form expressions for the sketching approximation ratios of multiple families of symmetric Boolean functions. Letting $\alpha'_k = 2^{-(k-1)} (1-k^{-2})^{(k-1)/2}$, we show that for odd $k \geq 3$, $\alpha(k$AND$) = \alpha'_k$, and for even $k \geq 2$, $\alpha(k$AND$) = 2\alpha'_{k+1}$. We also resolve the ratio for the "at-least-$(k-1)$-$1$'s" function for all even $k$; the "exactly-$\frac{k+1}2$-$1$'s" function for odd $k \in \{3,\ldots,51\}$; and fifteen other functions. We stress here that for general $f$, according to [CGSV21], closed-form expressions for $\alpha(f)$ need not have existed a priori. Separately, for all threshold functions, we give optimal "bias-based" approximation algorithms generalizing [CGV20] while simplifying [CGSV21]. Finally, we investigate the $\sqrt n$-space streaming lower bounds in [CGSV21], and show that they are incomplete for $3$AND.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Joanna Boyland, Michael Hwang, Tarun Prasad, Noah Singer, Santhoshini Velusamy. 2021-12-12. On sketching approximations for symmetric Boolean CSPs. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.approx/random.2022.38

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS