SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2201.04975

Faster Counting and Sampling Algorithms using Colorful Decision Oracle

Abstract

In this work, we consider $d$-{\sc Hyperedge Estimation} and $d$-{\sc Hyperedge Sample} problem in a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}(U(\mathcal{H}),\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{H}))$ in the query complexity framework, where $U(\mathcal{H})$ denotes the set of vertices and $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{H})$ denotes the set of hyperedges. The oracle access to the hypergraph is called {\sc Colorful Independence Oracle} ({\sc CID}), which takes $d$ (non-empty) pairwise disjoint subsets of vertices $A_1,\ldots,A_d \subseteq U(\mathcal{H})$ as input, and answers whether there exists a hyperedge in $\mathcal{H}$ having (exactly) one vertex in each $A_i, i \in \{1,2,\ldots,d\}$. The problem of $d$-{\sc Hyperedge Estimation} and $d$-{\sc Hyperedge Sample} with {\sc CID} oracle access is important in its own right as a combinatorial problem. Also, Dell {\it{et al.}}~[SODA '20] established that {\em decision} vs {\em counting} complexities of a number of combinatorial optimization problems can be abstracted out as $d$-{\sc Hyperedge Estimation} problems with a {\sc CID} oracle access. The main technical contribution of the paper is an algorithm that estimates $m= \lvert {\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{H})}\rvert$ with $\widehat{m}$ such that { $$ \frac{1}{C_{d}\log^{d-1} n} \;\leq\; \frac{\widehat{m}}{m} \;\leq\; C_{d} \log ^{d-1} n . $$ by using at most $C_{d}\log ^{d+2} n$ many {\sc CID} queries, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices in the hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ and $C_{d}$ is a constant that depends only on $d$}. Our result coupled with the framework of Dell {\it{et al.}}~[SODA '21] implies improved bounds for a number of fundamental problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anup Bhattacharya, Arijit Bishnu, Arijit Ghosh, Gopinath Mishra. 2022-01-13. Faster Counting and Sampling Algorithms using Colorful Decision Oracle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.04975

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS