SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2201.06898

Difference-in-Differences Estimators for Treatments Continuously Distributed at Every Period

Abstract

When studying the effects of taxes, tariffs, or prices using panel data, the treatment is often continuously distributed in every period. We develop difference-in-differences (DID) estimators for such settings. We partition units into switchers, whose treatment changes between consecutive periods, and stayers, whose treatment remains constant. Under a parallel-trends assumption, we show that the slopes of switchers' potential outcomes with respect to the treatment are nonparametrically identified by DID comparisons between switchers and stayers sharing the same baseline treatment level. Conditioning on the baseline treatment is key, as it ensures that the underlying parallel-trends assumption accommodates time-varying treatment effects. We then study two weighted averages of these slopes, discuss their respective advantages, and propose for each a doubly robust, semiparametrically efficient, and $\sqrt{n}$-consistent estimator. Finally, we extend our framework to instrumental variables and illustrate it by estimating the effects of gasoline taxes on prices and fuel consumption.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Clément de Chaisemartin, Xavier D'Haultfœuille, Félix Pasquier, Doulo Sow, Gonzalo Vazquez-Bare. 2022-01-18. Difference-in-Differences Estimators for Treatments Continuously Distributed at Every Period. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.06898

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM