arXiv subjects

Gonzalo Vazquez-Bare

Publications and source records attributed to Gonzalo Vazquez-Bare.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Difference-in-Differences Estimators for Treatments Continuously Distributed at Every Period

When studying the effects of taxes, tariffs, or prices using panel data, the treatment is often continuously distributed in every period. We develop difference-in-differences (DID) estimators for such settings. We partition units into switchers, whose treatment changes between consecutive periods, and stayers, whose treatment remains constant. Under a parallel-trends assumption, we show that the slopes of switchers' potential outcomes with respect to the treatment are nonparametrically identified by DID comparisons between switchers and stayers sharing the same baseline treatment level. Conditioning on the baseline treatment is key, as it ensures that the underlying parallel-trends assumption accommodates time-varying treatment effects. We then study two weighted averages of these slopes, discuss their respective advantages, and propose for each a doubly robust, semiparametrically efficient, and $\sqrt{n}$-consistent estimator. Finally, we extend our framework to instrumental variables and illustrate it by estimating the effects of gasoline taxes on prices and fuel consumption.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Post-Matching Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimation

When estimating treatment effects with two-way fixed effects (2WFE) models, researchers often use matching as a pre-processing step when the parallel trends assumption is thought to hold conditionally on covariates. Specifically, in a first step, each treated unit is matched to one or more untreated units based on observed time-invariant covariates. In the second step, treatment effects are estimated with a 2WFE regression in the matched sample, reweighting the untreated units by the number of times they are matched. We formally analyze this common practice and highlight two problems. First, when different treatment cohorts enter treatment in different time periods, the post-matching 2WFE estimator that pools all treated cohorts has an asymptotic bias, even when the treatment effect is constant across units and over time. Second, failing to account for the variability introduced by the matching procedure yields invalid standard error estimators, which can be biased upwards or downwards depending on the data generating process. We propose simple post-matching difference-in-differences estimators that compare each treated cohort to the never-treated separately, instead of pooling all treated cohorts. We provide conditions under which these estimators are consistent for well-defined causal parameters, and derive valid standard errors that account for the matching step. We illustrate our results with simulations and with an empirical application.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2024

Difference-in-Differences Estimators with Continuous Treatments and no Stayers

Many treatments or policy interventions are continuous in nature. Examples include prices, taxes or temperatures. Empirical researchers have usually relied on two-way fixed effect regressions to estimate treatment effects in such cases. However, such estimators are not robust to heterogeneous treatment effects in general; they also rely on the linearity of treatment effects. We propose estimators for continuous treatments that do not impose those restrictions, and that can be used when there are no stayers: the treatment of all units changes from one period to the next. We start by extending the nonparametric results of de Chaisemartin et al. (2023) to cases without stayers. We also present a parametric estimator, and use it to revisit Deschênes and Greenstone (2012).

econ.EM↗

arXiv2022

Identification and Estimation of Spillover Effects in Randomized Experiments

I study identification, estimation and inference for spillover effects in experiments where units' outcomes may depend on the treatment assignments of other units within a group. I show that the commonly-used reduced-form linear-in-means regression identifies a weighted sum of spillover effects with some negative weights, and that the difference in means between treated and controls identifies a combination of direct and spillover effects entering with different signs. I propose nonparametric estimators for average direct and spillover effects that overcome these issues and are consistent and asymptotically normal under a precise relationship between the number of parameters of interest, the total sample size and the treatment assignment mechanism. These findings are illustrated using data from a conditional cash transfer program and with simulations. The empirical results reveal the potential pitfalls of failing to flexibly account for spillover effects in policy evaluation: the estimated difference in means and the reduced-form linear-in-means coefficients are all close to zero and statistically insignificant, whereas the nonparametric estimators I propose reveal large, nonlinear and significant spillover effects.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2021

Causal Spillover Effects Using Instrumental Variables

I set up a potential outcomes framework to analyze spillover effects using instrumental variables. I characterize the population compliance types in a setting in which spillovers can occur on both treatment take-up and outcomes, and provide conditions for identification of the marginal distribution of compliance types. I show that intention-to-treat (ITT) parameters aggregate multiple direct and spillover effects for different compliance types, and hence do not have a clear link to causally interpretable parameters. Moreover, rescaling ITT parameters by first-stage estimands generally recovers a weighted combination of average effects where the sum of weights is larger than one. I then analyze identification of causal direct and spillover effects under one-sided noncompliance, and show that causal effects can be estimated by 2SLS in this case. I illustrate the proposed methods using data from an experiment on social interactions and voting behavior. I also introduce an alternative assumption, independence of peers' types, that identifies parameters of interest under two-sided noncompliance by restricting the amount of heterogeneity in average potential outcomes.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2020

The Regression Discontinuity Design

This handbook chapter gives an introduction to the sharp regression discontinuity design, covering identification, estimation, inference, and falsification methods.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2020

Analysis of Regression Discontinuity Designs with Multiple Cutoffs or Multiple Scores

We introduce the \texttt{Stata} (and \texttt{R}) package \texttt{rdmulti}, which includes three commands (\texttt{rdmc}, \texttt{rdmcplot}, \texttt{rdms}) for analyzing Regression Discontinuity (RD) designs with multiple cutoffs or multiple scores. The command \texttt{rdmc} applies to non-cumulative and cumulative multi-cutoff RD settings. It calculates pooled and cutoff-specific RD treatment effects, and provides robust bias-corrected inference procedures. Post estimation and inference is allowed. The command \texttt{rdmcplot} offers RD plots for multi-cutoff settings. Finally, the command \texttt{rdms} concerns multi-score settings, covering in particular cumulative cutoffs and two running variables contexts. It also calculates pooled and cutoff-specific RD treatment effects, provides robust bias-corrected inference procedures, and allows for post-estimation estimation and inference. These commands employ the \texttt{Stata} (and \texttt{R}) package \texttt{rdrobust} for plotting, estimation, and inference. Companion \texttt{R} functions with the same syntax and capabilities are provided.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2020

Extrapolating Treatment Effects in Multi-Cutoff Regression Discontinuity Designs

In non-experimental settings, the Regression Discontinuity (RD) design is one of the most credible identification strategies for program evaluation and causal inference. However, RD treatment effect estimands are necessarily local, making statistical methods for the extrapolation of these effects a key area for development. We introduce a new method for extrapolation of RD effects that relies on the presence of multiple cutoffs, and is therefore design-based. Our approach employs an easy-to-interpret identifying assumption that mimics the idea of "common trends" in difference-in-differences designs. We illustrate our methods with data on a subsidized loan program on post-education attendance in Colombia, and offer new evidence on program effects for students with test scores away from the cutoff that determined program eligibility.

econ.EM↗