Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2202.12826

A Systematic Literature Review about Idea Mining: The Use of Machine-driven Analytics to Generate Ideas

Workneh Y. Ayele·Gustaf Juell-Skielse
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Idea generation is the core activity of innovation. Digital data sources, which are sources of innovation, such as patents, publications, social media, websites, etc., are increasingly growing at unprecedented volume. Manual idea generation is time-consuming and is affected by the subjectivity of the individuals involved. Therefore, the use machine-driven data analytics techniques to analyze data to generate ideas and support idea generation by serving users is useful. The objective of this study is to study state-of the-art machine-driven analytics for idea generation and data sources, hence the result of this study will generally server as a guideline for choosing techniques and data sources. A systematic literature review is conducted to identify relevant scholarly literature from IEEE, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. We selected a total of 71 articles and analyzed them thematically. The results of this study indicate that idea generation through machine-driven analytics applies text mining, information retrieval (IR), artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, machine learning, statistical techniques, natural language processing (NLP), NLP-based morphological analysis, network analysis, and bibliometric to support idea generation. The results include a list of techniques and procedures in idea generation through machine-driven idea analytics. Additionally, characterization and heuristics used in idea generation are summarized. For the future, tools designed to generate ideas could be explored.

Explore related subjects

cs.IRcs.CLcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Workneh Y. Ayele, Gustaf Juell-Skielse. 2022-01-30. A Systematic Literature Review about Idea Mining: The Use of Machine-driven Analytics to Generate Ideas. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.12826

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How Do LLM-Generated Texts Impact Term-Based Retrieval Models?

As more content generated by large language models (LLMs) floods into the Internet, information retrieval (IR) systems now face the challenge of distinguishing and handling a blend of human-authored and machine-generated texts. Recent studies suggest that neural retrievers may exhibit a preferential inclination toward LLM-generated content, while classic term-based retrievers like BM25 tend to favor human-written documents. This paper investigates the influence of LLM-generated content on term-based retrieval models, which are valued for their efficiency and robust generalization across domains. Our linguistic analysis reveals that LLM-generated texts exhibit smoother high-frequency and steeper low-frequency Zipf slopes, higher term specificity, and greater document-level diversity. These traits are aligned with LLMs being trained to optimize reader experience through diverse and precise expressions. Our study further explores whether term-based retrieval models demonstrate source bias, concluding that these models prioritize documents whose term distributions closely correspond to those of the queries, rather than displaying an inherent source bias. This work provides a foundation for understanding and addressing potential biases in term-based IR systems managing mixed-source content.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

GRASP: Plan-Guided Graph Retrieval with Adaptive Fusion and Reranking on Semi-Structured Knowledge Bases

Retrieval over semi-structured knowledge bases (SKBs) must handle both textual descriptions and relational constraints. Text-based retrievers capture the overall semantics of a query but struggle with multi-hop relations, whereas graph-based retrievers follow relational paths precisely but miss the broader meaning. We propose GRASP, a hybrid retriever that learns to fuse the two. A small LLM planner translates the query into an executable graph plan in a single call, its graph ranking is fused with a text ranking, and a fine-tuned reranker reorders the fused candidates. Instead of training the planner to be accurate on its own, we optimize it with reinforcement learning to maximize the gain its graph ranking brings to the fused ranking. On three STaRK benchmarks, GRASP achieves the best results on all metrics, improving the average Hit@1 by 18.6 points over the strongest baseline, while taking only 2.47 seconds per query.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory

Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators. However, memory is not always beneficial: retrieved memories often induce a critical issue of sycophancy, causing agents to over-align with the user at the cost of factual accuracy or objective reasoning. Despite this emerging risk, existing memory benchmarks primarily evaluate whether memories are correctly stored, retrieved, or updated, while overlooking how retrieved memories influence downstream reasoning and decision-making. To bridge this gap, we propose MemSyco-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating memory-induced sycophancy in agent systems. MemSyco-Bench measures when memory should influence a decision and how valid memory should be used. Specifically, it covers five tasks that assess whether agents can reject memory as factual evidence, respect its applicable scope, resolve conflicts between memory and objective evidence, track memory updates, and use valid memory for personalization. All related resources are collected for the community at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/MemSyco-Bench.

cs.IR↗