GeoSPM: Geostatistical parametric mapping for medicine

Holger Engleitner; Ashwani Jha; Marta Suarez Pinilla; Amy Nelson; Daniel Herron; Geraint Rees; Karl Friston; Martin Rossor; Parashkev Nachev

arXiv · 2204.02354

GeoSPM: Geostatistical parametric mapping for medicine

Holger Engleitner·Ashwani Jha·Marta Suarez Pinilla·Amy Nelson·Daniel Herron·Geraint Rees·Karl Friston·Martin Rossor·Parashkev Nachev

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The characteristics and determinants of health and disease are often organised in space, reflecting our spatially extended nature. Understanding the influence of such factors requires models capable of capturing spatial relations. Though a mature discipline, spatial analysis is comparatively rare in medicine, arguably a consequence of the complexity of the domain and the inclemency of the data regimes that govern it. Drawing on statistical parametric mapping, a framework for topological inference well-established in the realm of neuroimaging, we propose and validate a novel approach to the spatial analysis of diverse clinical data - GeoSPM - based on differential geometry and random field theory. We evaluate GeoSPM across an extensive array of synthetic simulations encompassing diverse spatial relationships, sampling, and corruption by noise, and demonstrate its application on large-scale data from UK Biobank. GeoSPM is transparently interpretable, can be implemented with ease by non-specialists, enables flexible modelling of complex spatial relations, exhibits robustness to noise and under-sampling, offers well-founded criteria of statistical significance, and is through computational efficiency readily scalable to large datasets. We provide a complete, open-source software implementation of GeoSPM, and suggest that its adoption could catalyse the wider use of spatial analysis across the many aspects of medicine that urgently demand it.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Holger Engleitner, Ashwani Jha, Marta Suarez Pinilla, Amy Nelson, Daniel Herron, Geraint Rees, Karl Friston, Martin Rossor, Parashkev Nachev. 2022-04-05. GeoSPM: Geostatistical parametric mapping for medicine. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02354

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗