SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2204.11289

Complexity and Avoidance

Abstract

In this dissertation we examine the relationships between the several hierarchies, including the complexity, $\mathrm{LUA}$ (Linearly Universal Avoidance), and shift complexity hierarchies, with an eye towards quantitative bounds on growth rates therein. We show that for suitable $f$ and $p$, there are $q$ and $g$ such that $\mathrm{LUA}(q) \leq_\mathrm{s} \mathrm{COMPLEX}(f)$ and $\mathrm{COMPLEX}(g) \leq_\mathrm{s} \mathrm{LUA}(p)$, as well as quantify the growth rates of $q$ and $g$. In the opposite direction, we show that for certain sub-identical $f$ satisfying $\lim_{n \to \infty}{f(n)/n}=1$ there is a $q$ such that $\mathrm{COMPLEX}(f) \leq_\mathrm{w} \mathrm{LUA}(q)$, and for certain fast-growing $p$ there is a $g$ such that $\mathrm{LUA}(p) \leq_\mathrm{s} \mathrm{COMPLEX}(g)$, as well as quantify the growth rates of $q$ and $g$. Concerning shift complexity, explicit bounds are given on how slow-growing $q$ must be for any member of $\rm{LUA}(q)$ to compute $\delta$-shift complex sequences. Motivated by the complexity hierarchy, we generalize the notion of shift complexity to consider sequences $X$ satisfying $\operatorname{KP}(\tau) \geq f(|\tau|) - O(1)$ for all substrings $\tau$ of $X$ where $f$ is any order function. We show that for sufficiently slow-growing $f$, $f$-shift complex sequences can be uniformly computed by $g$-complex sequences, where $g$ grows slightly faster than $f$. The structure of the $\mathrm{LUA}$ hierarchy is examined using bushy tree forcing, with the main result being that for any order function $p$, there is a slow-growing order function $q$ such that $\mathrm{LUA}(p)$ and $\mathrm{LUA}(q)$ are weakly incomparable. Using this, we prove new results about the filter of the weak degrees of deep nonempty $\Pi^0_1$ classes and the connection between the shift complexity and $\mathrm{LUA}$ hierarchies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hayden Jananthan. 2022-04-24. Complexity and Avoidance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.11289

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO