SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2207.05150

Breaching the 2 LMP Approximation Barrier for Facility Location with Applications to k-Median

Abstract

The Uncapacitated Facility Location (UFL) problem is one of the most fundamental clustering problems: Given a set of clients $C$ and a set of facilities $F$ in a metric space $(C \cup F, dist)$ with facility costs $open : F \to \mathbb{R}^+$, the goal is to find a set of facilities $S \subseteq F$ to minimize the sum of the opening cost $open(S)$ and the connection cost $d(S) := \sum_{p \in C} \min_{c \in S} dist(p, c)$. An algorithm for UFL is called a Lagrangian Multiplier Preserving (LMP) $\alpha$ approximation if it outputs a solution $S\subseteq F$ satisfying $open(S) + d(S) \leq open(S^*) + \alpha d(S^*)$ for any $S^* \subseteq F$. The best-known LMP approximation ratio for UFL is at most $2$ by the JMS algorithm of Jain, Mahdian, and Saberi based on the Dual-Fitting technique. We present a (slightly) improved LMP approximation algorithm for UFL. This is achieved by combining the Dual-Fitting technique with Local Search, another popular technique to address clustering problems. From a conceptual viewpoint, our result gives a theoretical evidence that local search can be enhanced so as to avoid bad local optima by choosing the initial feasible solution with LP-based techniques. Using the framework of bipoint solutions, our result directly implies a (slightly) improved approximation for the $k$-Median problem from 2.6742 to 2.67059.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vincent Cohen-Addad, Fabrizio Grandoni, Euiwoong Lee, Chris Schwiegelshohn. 2022-07-11. Breaching the 2 LMP Approximation Barrier for Facility Location with Applications to k-Median. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05150

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS