SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2207.07417

Near-Linear Time and Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Tensor Decompositions

Abstract

We study low rank approximation of tensors, focusing on the tensor train and Tucker decompositions, as well as approximations with tree tensor networks and more general tensor networks. For tensor train decomposition, we give a bicriteria $(1 + \eps)$-approximation algorithm with a small bicriteria rank and $O(q \cdot \nnz(A))$ running time, up to lower order terms, which improves over the additive error algorithm of \cite{huber2017randomized}. We also show how to convert the algorithm of \cite{huber2017randomized} into a relative error algorithm, but their algorithm necessarily has a running time of $O(qr^2 \cdot \nnz(A)) + n \cdot \poly(qk/\eps)$ when converted to a $(1 + \eps)$-approximation algorithm with bicriteria rank $r$. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to achieve polynomial time relative error approximation for tensor train decomposition. Our key technique is a method for obtaining subspace embeddings with a number of rows polynomial in $q$ for a matrix which is the flattening of a tensor train of $q$ tensors. We extend our algorithm to tree tensor networks. In addition, we extend our algorithm to tensor networks with arbitrary graphs (which we refer to as general tensor networks), by using a result of \cite{ms08_simulating_quantum_tensor_contraction} and showing that a general tensor network of rank $k$ can be contracted to a binary tree network of rank $k^{O(\deg(G)\tw(G))}$, allowing us to reduce to the case of tree tensor networks. Finally, we give new fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for the tensor train, Tucker, and CP decompositions, which are simpler than those of \cite{swz19_tensor_low_rank} since they do not make use of polynomial system solvers. Our technique of Gaussian subspace embeddings with exactly $k$ rows (and thus exponentially small success probability) may be of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arvind V. Mahankali, David P. Woodruff, Ziyu Zhang. 2022-07-15. Near-Linear Time and Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Tensor Decompositions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.07417

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS