SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2209.04013

Trajectory Range Visibility

Abstract

Consider two entities with constant but not necessarily equal velocities, moving on two given piece-wise linear trajectories inside a simple polygon $P$. The Trajectory Range Visibility problem deals with determining the sub-trajectories on which two entities become visible to each other. A more straightforward decision version of this problem is called Trajectory Visibility, where the trajectories are line segments. The decision version specifies whether the entities can see one another. This version was studied by P. Eades et al. in 2020, where they supposed given constant velocities for the entities. However, the approach presented in this paper supports non-constant complexity trajectories. Furthermore, we report every pair of constant velocities with which the entities can see each other. In particular, for every constant velocity of a moving entity, we specify: $(1)$ All visible parts of the other entity's trajectory. $(2)$ All possible constant velocities of the other entity to become visible. Regarding line-segment trajectories, we present $\mathcal{O}(n \log n)$ running time algorithm which obtains all pairs of sub-trajectories on which the moving entities become visible to one another, where $n$ is the complexity of $P$. Regarding the general case, we provide an algorithm with $\mathcal{O}(n \log n + m(\log m + \log n))$ running time, where $m$ indicates the complexity of both trajectories. We offer $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ query time for line segment trajectories and $\mathcal{O}(\log m + k)$ for the non-constant complexity ones s.t. $k$ is the number of velocity ranges reported in the output. Interestingly, our results require only $\mathcal{O}(n + m)$ space for non-constant complexity trajectories.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Seyed Mohammad Hussein Kazemi, Arash Vaezi, Mohammad Ali Abam, Mohammad Ghodsi. 2022-08-29. Trajectory Range Visibility. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG