SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2209.13024

Improved and Generalized Algorithms for Burning a Planar Point Set

Abstract

Given a set $P$ of points in the plane, a point burning process is a discrete time process to burn all the points of $P$ where fires must be initiated at the given points. Specifically, the point burning process starts with a single burnt point from $P$, and at each subsequent step, burns all the points in the plane that are within one unit distance from the currently burnt points, as well as one other unburnt point of $P$ (if exists). The point burning number of $P$ is the smallest number of steps required to burn all the points of $P$. If we allow the fire to be initiated anywhere, then the burning process is called an anywhere burning process, and the corresponding burning number is called anywhere burning number. Computing the point and anywhere burning number is known to be NP-hard. In this paper we show that both these problems admit PTAS in one dimension. We then show that in two dimensions, point burning and anywhere burning are $(1.96296+\varepsilon)$ and $(1.92188+\varepsilon)$ approximable, respectively, for every $\varepsilon>0$, which improves the previously known $(2+\varepsilon)$ factor for these problems. We also observe that a known result on set cover problem can be leveraged to obtain a 2-approximation for burning the maximum number of points in a given number of steps. We show how the results generalize if we allow the points to have different fire spreading rates. Finally, we prove that even if the burning sources are given as input, finding a point burning sequence itself is NP-hard.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Prashant Gokhale, J. Mark Keil, Debajyoti Mondal. 2022-09-26. Improved and Generalized Algorithms for Burning a Planar Point Set. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG