SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2211.00407

Missing data interpolation in integrative multi-cohort analysis with disparate covariate information

Abstract

Integrative analysis of datasets generated by multiple cohorts is a widely-used approach for increasing sample size, precision of population estimators, and generalizability of analysis results in epidemiological studies. However, often each individual cohort dataset does not have all variables of interest for an integrative analysis collected as a part of an original study. Such cohort-level missingness poses methodological challenges to the integrative analysis since missing variables have traditionally: (1) been removed from the data for complete case analysis; or (2) been completed by missing data interpolation techniques using data with the same covariate distribution from other studies. In most integrative-analysis studies, neither approach is optimal as it leads to either loosing the majority of study covariates or challenges in specifying the cohorts following the same distributions. We propose a novel approach to identify the studies with same distributions that could be used for completing the cohort-level missing information. Our methodology relies on (1) identifying sub-groups of cohorts with similar covariate distributions using cohort identity random forest prediction models followed by clustering; and then (2) applying a recursive pairwise distribution test for high dimensional data to these sub-groups. Extensive simulation studies show that cohorts with the same distribution are correctly grouped together in almost all simulation settings. Our methods' application to two ECHO-wide Cohort Studies reveals that the cohorts grouped together reflect the similarities in study design. The methods are implemented in R software package relate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ekaterina Smirnova, Yongqi Zhong, Rasha Alsaadawi, Xu Ning, Amii Kress, Jordan Kuiper, Mingyu Zhang, Kristen Lyall, Sheenas Martenies, Akram Alshawabkeh, Catherine Bulka, Carlos Camargo, Jaeun Choi, Elena Colicino, Anne Dunlop, Michael Elliott, Assiamira Ferrara, Tebeb Gebrestadik, Jiang Gui, Kylie Harrall, Tina Hartert, Barry Lester, Andrew Manigault, Justin Manjourides, Yu Ni, Rosalind Wright, Robert Wright, Katherine Ziegler, Bryan Lau. 2022-11-01. Missing data interpolation in integrative multi-cohort analysis with disparate covariate information. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00407

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME