Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2211.05891

A Closer Cut: Computing Near-Optimal Lawn Mowing Tours

Sándor P. Fekete·Dominik Krupke·Michael Perk·Christian Rieck·Christian Scheffer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

For a given polygonal region $P$, the Lawn Mowing Problem (LMP) asks for a shortest tour $T$ that gets within Euclidean distance 1 of every point in $P$; this is equivalent to computing a shortest tour for a unit-disk cutter $C$ that covers all of $P$. As a geometric optimization problem of natural practical and theoretical importance, the LMP generalizes and combines several notoriously difficult problems, including minimum covering by disks, the Traveling Salesman Problem with neighborhoods (TSPN), and the Art Gallery Problem (AGP). In this paper, we conduct the first study of the Lawn Mowing Problem with a focus on practical computation of near-optimal solutions. We provide new theoretical insights: Optimal solutions are polygonal paths with a bounded number of vertices, allowing a restriction to straight-line solutions; on the other hand, there can be relatively simple instances for which optimal solutions require a large class of irrational coordinates. On the practical side, we present a primal-dual approach with provable convergence properties based on solving a special case of the TSPN restricted to witness sets. In each iteration, this establishes both a valid solution and a valid lower bound, and thereby a bound on the remaining optimality gap. As we demonstrate in an extensive computational study, this allows us to achieve provably optimal and near-optimal solutions for a large spectrum of benchmark instances with up to 2000 vertices.

Explore related subjects

cs.CG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sándor P. Fekete, Dominik Krupke, Michael Perk, Christian Rieck, Christian Scheffer. 2022-11-10. A Closer Cut: Computing Near-Optimal Lawn Mowing Tours. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05891

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG↗