SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2211.06790

Near-Linear Sample Complexity for $L_p$ Polynomial Regression

Abstract

We study $L_p$ polynomial regression. Given query access to a function $f:[-1,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, the goal is to find a degree $d$ polynomial $\hat{q}$ such that, for a given parameter $\varepsilon > 0$, $$ \|\hat{q}-f\|_p\le (1+\varepsilon) \cdot \min_{q:\text{deg}(q)\le d}\|q-f\|_p. $$ Here $\|\cdot\|_p$ is the $L_p$ norm, $\|g\|_p = (\int_{-1}^1 |g(t)|^p dt)^{1/p}$. We show that querying $f$ at points randomly drawn from the Chebyshev measure on $[-1,1]$ is a near-optimal strategy for polynomial regression in all $L_p$ norms. In particular, to find $\hat q$, it suffices to sample $O(d\, \frac{\text{polylog}\,d}{\text{poly}\,\varepsilon})$ points from $[-1,1]$ with probabilities proportional to this measure. While the optimal sample complexity for polynomial regression was well understood for $L_2$ and $L_\infty$, our result is the first that achieves sample complexity linear in $d$ and error $(1+\varepsilon)$ for other values of $p$ without any assumptions. Our result requires two main technical contributions. The first concerns $p\leq 2$, for which we provide explicit bounds on the $L_p$ Lewis weight function of the infinite linear operator underlying polynomial regression. Using tools from the orthogonal polynomial literature, we show that this function is bounded by the Chebyshev density. Our second key contribution is to take advantage of the structure of polynomials to reduce the $p>2$ case to the $p\leq 2$ case. By doing so, we obtain a better sample complexity than what is possible for general $p$-norm linear regression problems, for which $\Omega(d^{p/2})$ samples are required.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Raphael A. Meyer, Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco, David P. Woodruff, Samson Zhou. 2022-11-13. Near-Linear Sample Complexity for $L_p$ Polynomial Regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06790

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS