SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2211.11923

On Optimal Coreset Construction for Euclidean $(k,z)$-Clustering

Abstract

Constructing small-sized coresets for various clustering problems in different metric spaces has attracted significant attention for the past decade. A central problem in the coreset literature is to understand what is the best possible coreset size for $(k,z)$-clustering in Euclidean space. While there has been significant progress in the problem, there is still a gap between the state-of-the-art upper and lower bounds. For instance, the best known upper bound for $k$-means ($z=2$) is $\min \{O(k^{3/2} \varepsilon^{-2}),O(k \varepsilon^{-4})\}$ [1,2], while the best known lower bound is $\Omega(k\varepsilon^{-2})$ [1]. In this paper, we make significant progress on both upper and lower bounds. For a large range of parameters (i.e., $\varepsilon, k$), we have a complete understanding of the optimal coreset size. In particular, we obtain the following results: (1) We present a new coreset lower bound $\Omega(k \varepsilon^{-z-2})$ for Euclidean $(k,z)$-clustering when $\varepsilon \geq \Omega(k^{-1/(z+2)})$. In view of the prior upper bound $\tilde{O}_z(k \varepsilon^{-z-2})$ [1], the bound is optimal. The new lower bound also implies improved lower bounds for $(k,z)$-clustering in doubling metrics. (2) For the upper bound, we provide efficient coreset construction algorithms for $(k,z)$-clustering with improved or optimal coreset sizes in several metric spaces. In particular, we provide an $\tilde{O}_z(k^{\frac{2z+2}{z+2}} \varepsilon^{-2})$-sized coreset, with a unfied analysis, for $(k,z)$-clustering for all $z\geq 1$ in Euclidean space. [1] Cohen-Addad, Larsen, Saulpic, Schwiegelshohn. STOC'22. [2] Cohen-Addad, Larsen, Saulpic, Schwiegelshohn, Sheikh-Omar, NeurIPS'22.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lingxiao Huang, Jian Li, Xuan Wu. 2022-11-22. On Optimal Coreset Construction for Euclidean $(k,z)$-Clustering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.11923

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS