SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2211.13513

Waterproof: Educational Software for Learning How to Write Mathematical Proofs

Abstract

In order to help students learn how to write mathematical proofs, we adapt the Coq proof assistant into an educational tool we call Waterproof. Like with other interactive theorem provers, students write out their proofs inside the software using a specific syntax, and the software provides feedback on the logical validity of each step. Waterproof consists of two components: a custom proof language that allows formal, machine-verified proofs to be written in a style that closely resembles handwritten proofs, and a custom editor that allows these proofs to be combined with formatted text to improve readability. The editor can be used for Coq documents in general, but also offers special features designed for use in education. Student input, for example, can be limited to specific parts of the document to prevent exercises from being accidentally deleted. Waterproof has been used to supplement teaching the Analysis 1 course at Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) for the last four years. Students started using the specific formulations of proof steps from the custom proof language in their handwritten proofs; the explicit phrasing of these sentences helped to clarify the logical structure of their arguments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jelle Wemmenhove, Dick Arends, Thijs Beurskens, Maitreyee Bhaid, Sean McCarren, Jan Moraal, Diego Rivera Garrido, David Tuin, Malcolm Vassallo, Pieter Wils, Jim Portegies. 2022-11-24. Waterproof: Educational Software for Learning How to Write Mathematical Proofs. https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.400.7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO