SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2303.04350

Improved Bounds for Covering Paths and Trees in the Plane

Abstract

A covering path for a planar point set is a path drawn in the plane with straight-line edges such that every point lies at a vertex or on an edge of the path. A covering tree is defined analogously. Let $\pi(n)$ be the minimum number such that every set of $n$ points in the plane can be covered by a noncrossing path with at most $\pi(n)$ edges. Let $\tau(n)$ be the analogous number for noncrossing covering trees. Dumitrescu, Gerbner, Keszegh, and T\'oth (Discrete & Computational Geometry, 2014) established the following inequalities: \[\frac{5n}{9} - O(1) < \pi(n) < \left(1-\frac{1}{601080391}\right)n, \quad\text{and} \quad\frac{9n}{17} - O(1) < \tau(n)\leqslant \left\lfloor\frac{5n}{6}\right\rfloor.\] We report the following improved upper bounds: \[\pi(n)\leqslant \left(1-\frac{1}{22}\right)n, \quad\text{and}\quad \tau(n)\leqslant \left\lceil\frac{4n}{5}\right\rceil.\] In the same context we study rainbow polygons. For a set of colored points in the plane, a perfect rainbow polygon is a simple polygon that contains exactly one point of each color in its interior or on its boundary. Let $\rho(k)$ be the minimum number such that every $k$-colored point set in the plane admits a perfect rainbow polygon of size $\rho(k)$. Flores-Pe\~naloza, Kano, Mart\'inez-Sandoval, Orden, Tejel, T\'oth, Urrutia, and Vogtenhuber (Discrete Mathematics, 2021) proved that $20k/19 - O(1) <\rho(k) < 10k/7 + O(1).$ We report the improved upper bound $\rho(k)< 7k/5 + O(1)$. To obtain the improved bounds we present simple $O(n\log n)$-time algorithms that achieve paths, trees, and polygons with our desired number of edges.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ahmad Biniaz. 2023-03-08. Improved Bounds for Covering Paths and Trees in the Plane. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04350

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG