Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2304.08505

Noncommutative Geometry and Gauge theories on AF algebras

Gaston Nieuviarts
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Non-commutative geometry (NCG) is a mathematical discipline developed in the 1990s by Alain Connes. It is presented as a new generalization of usual geometry, both encompassing and going beyond the Riemannian framework, within a purely algebraic formalism. Like Riemannian geometry, NCG also has links with physics. Indeed, NCG provided a powerful framework for the reformulation of the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SMPP), taking into account General Relativity, in a single "geometric" representation, based on Non-Commutative Gauge Theories (NCGFT). Moreover, this accomplishment provides a convenient framework to study various possibilities to go beyond the SMPP, such as Grand Unified Theories (GUTs). This thesis intends to show an elegant method recently developed by Thierry Masson and myself, which proposes a general scheme to elaborate GUTs in the framework of NCGFTs. This concerns the study of NCGFTs based on approximately finite $C^*$-algebras (AF-algebras), using either derivations of the algebra or spectral triples to build up the underlying differential structure of the Gauge Theory. The inductive sequence defining the AF-algebra is used to allow the construction of a sequence of NCGFTs of Yang-Mills Higgs types, so that the rank $n+1$ can represent a grand unified theory of the rank $n$. The main advantage of this framework is that it controls, using appropriate conditions, the interaction of the degrees of freedom along the inductive sequence on the AF algebra. This suggests a way to obtain GUT-like models while offering many directions of theoretical investigation to go beyond the SMPP.

Explore related subjects

math-phhep-thmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gaston Nieuviarts. 2023-04-17. Noncommutative Geometry and Gauge theories on AF algebras. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08505

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗