SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2305.17385

Finding Diameter-Reducing Shortcuts in Trees

Abstract

In the \emph{$k$-Diameter-Optimally Augmenting Tree Problem} we are given a tree $T$ of $n$ vertices as input. The tree is embedded in an unknown \emph{metric} space and we have unlimited access to an oracle that, given two distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ of $T$, can answer queries reporting the cost of the edge $(u,v)$ in constant time. We want to augment $T$ with $k$ shortcuts in order to minimize the diameter of the resulting graph. For $k=1$, $O(n \log n)$ time algorithms are known both for paths [Wang, CG 2018] and trees [Bil\`o, TCS 2022]. In this paper we investigate the case of multiple shortcuts. We show that no algorithm that performs $o(n^2)$ queries can provide a better than $10/9$-approximate solution for trees for $k\geq 3$. For any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we instead design a linear-time $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for paths and $k = o(\sqrt{\log n})$, thus establishing a dichotomy between paths and trees for $k\geq 3$. We achieve the claimed running time by designing an ad-hoc data structure, which also serves as a key component to provide a linear-time $4$-approximation algorithm for trees, and to compute the diameter of graphs with $n + k - 1$ edges in time $O(n k \log n)$ even for non-metric graphs. Our data structure and the latter result are of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Davide Bilò, Luciano Gualà, Stefano Leucci, Luca Pepè Sciarria. 2023-05-27. Finding Diameter-Reducing Shortcuts in Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17385

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS