Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2306.07211

Differential Game Analysis for Cooperation Models in Automotive Supply Chain under Low-Carbon Emission Reduction Policies

Yukun Cheng·Zhanghao Yao·Xinxin Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the context of reducing carbon emissions in the automotive supply chain, collaboration between vehicle manufacturers and retailers has proven to be an effective measure for enhancing carbon emission reduction within the enterprise. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of such collaboration by constructing a differential game model that incorporates carbon trading and consumer preferences for low-carbon products. The model examines the decision-making process of an automotive supply chain comprising a vehicle manufacturer and multiple retailers. By utilizing the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, we analyze the equilibrium strategies of the participants under both a decentralized model and a Stackelberg leader-follower game model. In the decentralized model, the vehicle manufacturer optimizes its carbon emission reduction efforts, while each retailer independently determines its low-carbon promotion efforts and vehicle retail price. In the Stackelberg leader-follower game model, the vehicle manufacturer cooperates with the retailers by offering them a subsidy. Consequently, the manufacturer plays as the leader, making decisions on carbon emission reduction efforts and the subsidy rate, while the retailers, as followers, compute their promotion efforts and retail prices accordingly. Through theoretical analysis and numerical experiments considering the manufacturer's and retailers' efforts, the low-carbon reputation of vehicles, and the overall system profits under both models, we conclude that compared to the decentralized model, where each party pursues individual profits, the collaboration in the Stackelberg game yields greater benefits for both parties. Furthermore, this collaborative approach promotes the long-term development of the automotive supply chain.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yukun Cheng, Zhanghao Yao, Xinxin Wang. 2023-06-12. Differential Game Analysis for Cooperation Models in Automotive Supply Chain under Low-Carbon Emission Reduction Policies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07211

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗