SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2306.11522

Observation Routes and External Watchman Routes

Abstract

We introduce the Observation Route Problem ($\textsf{ORP}$) defined as follows: Given a set of $n$ pairwise disjoint compact regions in the plane, find a shortest tour (route) such that an observer walking along this tour can see (observe) some point in each region from some point of the tour. The observer does \emph{not} need to see the entire boundary of an object. The tour is \emph{not} allowed to intersect the interior of any region (i.e., the regions are obstacles and therefore out of bounds). The problem exhibits similarity to both the Traveling Salesman Problem with Neighborhoods ($\textsf{TSPN}$) and the External Watchman Route Problem ($\textsf{EWRP}$). We distinguish two variants: the range of visibility is either limited to a bounding rectangle, or unlimited. We obtain the following results: (I) Given a family of $n$ disjoint convex bodies in the plane, computing a shortest observation route does not admit a $(c\log n)$-approximation unless $\textsf{P} = \textsf{NP}$ for an absolute constant $c>0$. (This holds for both limited and unlimited vision.) (II) Given a family of disjoint convex bodies in the plane, computing a shortest external watchman route is $\textsf{NP}$-hard. (This holds for both limited and unlimited vision; and even for families of axis-aligned squares.) (III) Given a family of $n$ disjoint fat convex polygons, an observation tour whose length is at most $O(\log{n})$ times the optimal can be computed in polynomial time. (This holds for limited vision.) (IV) For every $n \geq 5$, there exists a convex polygon with $n$ sides and all angles obtuse such that its perimeter is \emph{not} a shortest external watchman route. This refutes a conjecture by Absar and Whitesides (2006).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Adrian Dumitrescu, Csaba D. Tóth. 2023-06-20. Observation Routes and External Watchman Routes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2024.114818

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG