Delaying Decisions and Reservation Costs

Elisabet Burjons; Fabian Frei; Matthias Gehnen; Henri Lotze; Daniel Mock; Peter Rossmanith

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2307.07284

Delaying Decisions and Reservation Costs

Elisabet Burjons·Fabian Frei·Matthias Gehnen·Henri Lotze·Daniel Mock·Peter Rossmanith

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the Feedback Vertex Set and the Vertex Cover problem in a natural variant of the classical online model that allows for delayed decisions and reservations. Both problems can be characterized by an obstruction set of subgraphs that the online graph needs to avoid. In the case of the Vertex Cover problem, the obstruction set consists of an edge (i.e., the graph of two adjacent vertices), while for the Feedback Vertex Set problem, the obstruction set contains all cycles. In the delayed-decision model, an algorithm needs to maintain a valid partial solution after every request, thus allowing it to postpone decisions until the current partial solution is no longer valid for the current request. The reservation model grants an online algorithm the new and additional option to pay a so-called reservation cost for any given element in order to delay the decision of adding or rejecting it until the end of the instance. For the Feedback Vertex Set problem, we first analyze the variant with only delayed decisions, proving a lower bound of $4$ and an upper bound of $5$ on the competitive ratio. Then we look at the variant with both delayed decisions and reservation. We show that given bounds on the competitive ratio of a problem with delayed decisions impliy lower and upper bounds for the same problem when adding the option of reservations. This observation allows us to give a lower bound of $\min{\{1+3\alpha,4\}}$ and an upper bound of $\min{\{1+5\alpha,5\}}$ for the Feedback Vertex Set problem. Finally, we show that the online Vertex Cover problem, when both delayed decisions and reservations are allowed, is $\min{\{1+2\alpha, 2\}}$-competitive, where $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ is the reservation cost per reserved vertex.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Elisabet Burjons, Fabian Frei, Matthias Gehnen, Henri Lotze, Daniel Mock, Peter Rossmanith. 2023-07-14. Delaying Decisions and Reservation Costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07284

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗