arXiv subjects

Peter Rossmanith

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Rossmanith.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

On the Impact of Stability and the Helly Property on the Dominating Set Problem

We extend the algorithmic framework of progressive exploration [Fabia\'nski et al., STACS 2019], which yields simple, yet surprisingly general and efficient parameterized algorithms for Dominating Set, Independent Set, and some of their variants. While they identified stability and the Helly property as necessary for their approach, we show that -- with a simple change -- in the case of Dominating Set, one can get rid of the stability requirement. This yields a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm on exactly those graph classes which do not contain long co-matchings or double-ladders as semi-induced subgraphs. Lifting one of these two restrictions makes Dominating Set W[1]-hard on these classes. Our algorithm generalizes results on weakly $\gamma$-closed graphs, and results from Sparsity theory, e.g., nowhere dense and biclique-free classes. At the same time, we match the time complexity of the previously known algorithms on those classes. We demonstrate that this technique can easily be applied to the Distance-$r$ Dominating Set and the Set Cover problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Uniform Universal Sets, Splitters, and Bisectors

Given a subset of size $k$ of a very large universe a randomized way to find this subset could consist of deleting half of the universe and then searching the remaining part. With a probability of $2^{-k}$ one will succeed. By probability amplification, a randomized algorithm needs about $2^k$ rounds until it succeeds. We construct bisectors that derandomize this process and have size~$2^{k+o(k)}$. One application is derandomization of reductions between average case complexity classes. We also construct uniform $(n,k)$-universal sets that generalize universal sets in such a way that they are bisectors at the same time. This construction needs only linear time and produces families of asymptotically optimal size without using advanced combinatorial constructions as subroutines, which previous families did, but are basedmainly on modulo functions and refined brute force search.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Solving Partial Dominating Set and Related Problems Using Twin-Width

Partial vertex cover and partial dominating set are two well-investigated optimization problems. While they are $\rm W[1]$-hard on general graphs, they have been shown to be fixed-parameter tractable on many sparse graph classes, including nowhere-dense classes. In this paper, we demonstrate that these problems are also fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the twin-width of a graph. Indeed, we establish a more general result: every graph property that can be expressed by a logical formula of the form $\phi\equiv\exists x_1\cdots \exists x_k \sum_{\alpha \in I} \#y\,\psi_\alpha(x_1,\ldots,x_k,y)\ge t$, where $\psi_\alpha$ is a quantifier-free formula for each $\alpha \in I$, $t$ is an arbitrary number, and $\#y$ is a counting quantifier, can be evaluated in time $f(d,k)n$, where $n$ is the number of vertices and $d$ is the width of a contraction sequence that is part of the input. In addition to the aforementioned problems, this includes also connected partial dominating set and independent partial dominating set.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

A Uniform Framework for Problems on Context-Free Grammars

In a paper published in Information Processing Letters in 2000, Bouajjani et al. presented an automata-based approach to a number of elementary problems on context-free grammars. This approach is of pedagogical interest since it provides a uniform solution to decision procedures usually solved by independent algorithms in textbooks. This paper improves upon the work by Bouajjani et al. in a number of ways. We present a new algorithm which not only has a better space complexity but is also (in our opinion) easier to read and understand. Moreover, a closer inspection reveals that the new algorithm is competitive to well-known solutions for most (but not all) standard problems.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2024

Online Unbounded Knapsack

We analyze the competitive ratio and the advice complexity of the online unbounded knapsack problem. An instance is given as a sequence of n items with a size and a value each, and an algorithm has to decide how often to pack each item into a knapsack of bounded capacity. The items are given online and the total size of the packed items must not exceed the knapsack's capacity, while the objective is to maximize the total value of the packed items. While each item can only be packed once in the classical 0-1 knapsack problem, the unbounded version allows for items to be packed multiple times. We show that the simple unbounded knapsack problem, where the size of each item is equal to its value, allows for a competitive ratio of 2. We also analyze randomized algorithms and show that, in contrast to the 0-1 knapsack problem, one uniformly random bit cannot improve an algorithm's performance. More randomness lowers the competitive ratio to less than 1.736, but it can never be below 1.693. In the advice complexity setting, we measure how many bits of information the algorithm has to know to achieve some desired solution quality. For the simple unbounded knapsack problem, one advice bit lowers the competitive ratio to 3/2. While this cannot be improved with fewer than log(n) advice bits for instances of length n, a competitive ratio of 1+epsilon can be achieved with O(log(n/epsilon)/epsilon) advice bits for any epsilon>0. We further show that no amount of advice bounded by a function f(n) allows an algorithm to be optimal. We also study the online general unbounded knapsack problem and show that it does not allow for any bounded competitive ratio for deterministic and randomized algorithms, as well as for algorithms using fewer than log(n) advice bits. We also provide an algorithm that uses O(log(n/epsilon)/epsilon) advice bits to achieve a competitive ratio of 1+epsilon for any epsilon>0.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Tree Coloring: Random Order and Predictions

Coloring is a notoriously hard problem, and even more so in the online setting, where each arriving vertex has to be colored immediately and irrevocably. Already on trees, which are trivially two-colorable, it is impossible to achieve anything better than a logarithmic competitive ratio. We show how to undercut this bound by a double-logarithmic factor in the slightly relaxed online model where the vertices arrive in random order. We then also analyze algorithms with predictions, showing how well we can color trees with machine-learned advice of varying reliability. We further extend our analysis to all two-colorable graphs and provide matching lower bounds in both cases. Finally, we demonstrate how the two mentioned approaches, both of which diminish the often unjustified pessimism of the classical online model, can be combined to yield even better results.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Delaying Decisions and Reservation Costs

We study the Feedback Vertex Set and the Vertex Cover problem in a natural variant of the classical online model that allows for delayed decisions and reservations. Both problems can be characterized by an obstruction set of subgraphs that the online graph needs to avoid. In the case of the Vertex Cover problem, the obstruction set consists of an edge (i.e., the graph of two adjacent vertices), while for the Feedback Vertex Set problem, the obstruction set contains all cycles. In the delayed-decision model, an algorithm needs to maintain a valid partial solution after every request, thus allowing it to postpone decisions until the current partial solution is no longer valid for the current request. The reservation model grants an online algorithm the new and additional option to pay a so-called reservation cost for any given element in order to delay the decision of adding or rejecting it until the end of the instance. For the Feedback Vertex Set problem, we first analyze the variant with only delayed decisions, proving a lower bound of $4$ and an upper bound of $5$ on the competitive ratio. Then we look at the variant with both delayed decisions and reservation. We show that given bounds on the competitive ratio of a problem with delayed decisions impliy lower and upper bounds for the same problem when adding the option of reservations. This observation allows us to give a lower bound of $\min{\{1+3\alpha,4\}}$ and an upper bound of $\min{\{1+5\alpha,5\}}$ for the Feedback Vertex Set problem. Finally, we show that the online Vertex Cover problem, when both delayed decisions and reservations are allowed, is $\min{\{1+2\alpha, 2\}}$-competitive, where $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ is the reservation cost per reserved vertex.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Evaluating Restricted First-Order Counting Properties on Nowhere Dense Classes and Beyond

It is known that first-order logic with some counting extensions can be efficiently evaluated on graph classes with bounded expansion, where depth-$r$ minors have constant density. More precisely, the formulas are $\exists x_1 ... x_k \#y \varphi(x_1,...,x_k, y)>N$, where $\varphi$ is an FO-formula. If $\varphi$ is quantifier-free, we can extend this result to nowhere dense graph classes with an almost linear FPT run time. Lifting this result further to slightly more general graph classes, namely almost nowhere dense classes, where the size of depth-$r$ clique minors is subpolynomial, is impossible unless FPT=W[1]. On the other hand, in almost nowhere dense classes we can approximate such counting formulas with a small additive error. Note those counting formulas are contained in FOC({<}) but not FOC1(P). In particular, it follows that partial covering problems, such as partial dominating set, have fixed parameter algorithms on nowhere dense graph classes with almost linear running time.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2020

Approximate Evaluation of First-Order Counting Queries

Kuske and Schweikardt introduced the very expressive first-order counting logic FOC(P) to model database queries with counting operations. They showed that there is an efficient model-checking algorithm on graphs with bounded degree, while Grohe and Schweikardt showed that probably no such algorithm exists for trees of bounded depth. We analyze the fragment FO({>0}) of this logic. While we remove for example subtraction and comparison between two non-atomic counting terms, this logic remains quite expressive: We allow nested counting and comparison between counting terms and arbitrarily large numbers. Our main result is an approximation scheme of the model-checking problem for FO({>0}) that runs in linear fpt time on structures with bounded expansion. This scheme either gives the correct answer or says "I do not know." The latter answer may only be given if small perturbations in the number-symbols of the formula could make it both satisfied and unsatisfied. This is complemented by showing that exactly solving the model-checking problem for FO({>0}) is already hard on trees of bounded depth and just slightly increasing the expressiveness of FO({>0}) makes even approximation hard on trees.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2020

Online Simple Knapsack with Reservation Costs

In the online simple knapsack problem items are presented in an iterative fashion and an algorithm has to decide for each item whether to reject or permanently include it into the knapsack without any knowledge about the rest of the instance. The goal is to pack the knapsack as full as possible. In this work, we introduce the option of reserving items for the cost of a fixed fraction $\alpha$ of their size. An algorithm may pay this fraction in order to postpone its decision on whether to include or reject these items until after the last item of the instance was presented. While the classical online simple knapsack problem does not admit any constantly bounded competitive ratio in the deterministic setting, we find that adding the possibility of reservation makes the problem constantly competitive. We give tight bounds for the whole range of $\alpha$ from $0$ to $1$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

First-Order Model-Checking in Random Graphs and Complex Networks

Complex networks are everywhere. They appear for example in the form of biological networks, social networks, or computer networks and have been studied extensively. Efficient algorithms to solve problems on complex networks play a central role in today's society. Algorithmic meta-theorems show that many problems can be solved efficiently. Since logic is a powerful tool to model problems, it has been used to obtain very general meta-theorems. In this work, we consider all problems definable in first-order logic and analyze which properties of complex networks allow them to be solved efficiently. The mathematical tool to describe complex networks are random graph models. We define a property of random graph models called $\alpha$-power-law-boundedness. Roughly speaking, a random graph is $\alpha$-power-law-bounded if it does not admit strong clustering and its degree sequence is bounded by a power-law distribution with exponent at least $\alpha$ (i.e. the fraction of vertices with degree $k$ is roughly $O(k^{-\alpha})$). We solve the first-order model-checking problem (parameterized by the length of the formula) in almost linear FPT time on random graph models satisfying this property with $\alpha \ge 3$. This means in particular that one can solve every problem expressible in first-order logic in almost linear expected time on these random graph models. This includes for example preferential attachment graphs, Chung-Lu graphs, configuration graphs, and sparse Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi graphs. Our results match known hardness results and generalize previous tractability results on this topic.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2020

Removable Online Knapsack and Advice

In the knapsack problem, we are given a knapsack of some capacity and a set of items, each with a size and a value. The goal is to pack a selection of these items fitting the knapsack that maximizes the total value. The online version of this problem reveals the items one by one. For each item, the algorithm must decide immediately whether to pack it or not. We consider a natural variant of this problem, coined removable online knapsack. It differs from the classical variant by allowing the removal of packed items. Repacking is impossible, however: Once an item is removed, it is gone for good. We analyze the advice complexity of this problem. It measures how many advice bits an omniscient oracle needs to provide for an online algorithm to reach any given competitive ratio, which is, understood in its strict sense, just the approximation factor. We show that the competitive ratio jumps from unbounded without advice to near-optimal with just constantly many advice bits, a behavior unique among all problems examined so far. We also examine algorithms with barely any advice, for example just a single bit, and analyze the special case of the proportional knapsack problem, where an item's size always equals its value. We show that advice algorithms have various concrete applications and that lower bounds on the advice complexity of any problem are exceptionally strong. Our results improve some of the best known lower bounds on the competitive ratio for randomized algorithms and even for deterministic deterministic algorithms in established models such as knapsack with a resource buffer and various problems with multiple knapsacks. The seminal paper introducing knapsack with removability proposed such a problem for which we can even establish a one-to-one correspondence with the advice model; this paper therefore also provides a comprehensive analysis for this neglected problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

The Complexity of Packing Edge-Disjoint Paths

We introduce and study the complexity of Path Packing. Given a graph $G$ and a list of paths, the task is to embed the paths edge-disjoint in $G$. This generalizes the well known Hamiltonian-Path problem. Since Hamiltonian Path is efficiently solvable for graphs of small treewidth, we study how this result translates to the much more general Path Packing. On the positive side, we give an FPT-algorithm on trees for the number of paths as parameter. Further, we give an XP-algorithm with the combined parameters maximal degree, number of connected components and number of nodes of degree at least three. Surprisingly the latter is an almost tight result by runtime and parameterization. We show an ETH lower bound almost matching our runtime. Moreover, if two of the three values are constant and one is unbounded the problem becomes NP-hard. Further, we study restrictions to the given list of paths. On the positive side, we present an FPT-algorithm parameterized by the sum of the lengths of the paths. Packing paths of length two is polynomial time solvable, while packing paths of length three is NP-hard. Finally, even the spacial case EPC where the paths have to cover every edge in $G$ exactly once is already NP-hard for two paths on 4-regular graphs.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2018

Reoptimization of Parameterized Problems

Parameterized complexity allows us to analyze the time complexity of problems with respect to a natural parameter depending on the problem. Reoptimization looks for solutions or approximations for problem instances when given solutions to neighboring instances. We try to combine both techniques, in order to better classify the complexity of problems in the parameterized setting. Specifically, we see that some problems in the class of compositional problems, which do not have polynomial kernels under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions, do have polynomial kernels under reoptimization for some local modifications. Moreover, we find that the reoptimization version of Vertex Cover has a polynomial kernel of size 2k using crown decomposition. Finally, in a negative result, we prove that the reoptimization version of Connected Vertex Cover does not have a Turing kernelization unless Set Cover has a polynomial kernel

cs.CC↗

arXiv2018

Fast Dynamic Programming on Graph Decompositions

In this paper, we consider tree decompositions, branch decompositions, and clique decompositions. We improve the running time of dynamic programming algorithms on these graph decompositions for a large number of problems as a function of the treewidth, branchwidth, or cliquewidth, respectively. On tree decompositions of width $k$, we improve the running time for Dominating Set to $O(3^k)$. We generalise this result to $[\rho,\sigma]$-domination problems with finite or cofinite $\rho$ and $\sigma$. For these problems, we give $O(s^k)$-time algorithms, where $s$ is the number of `states' a vertex can have in a standard dynamic programming algorithm for such a problems. Furthermore, we give an $O(2^k)$-time algorithm for counting the number of perfect matchings in a graph, and generalise this to $O(2^k)$-time algorithms for many clique covering, packing, and partitioning problems. On branch decompositions of width $k$, we give an $O(3^{\frac{\omega}{2}k})$-time algorithm for Dominating Set, an $O(2^{\frac{\omega}{2}k})$-time algorithm for counting the number of perfect matchings, and $O(s^{\frac{\omega}{2}k})$-time algorithms for $[\rho,\sigma]$-domination problems involving $s$ states with finite or cofinite $\rho$ and $\sigma$. Finally, on clique decompositions of width $k$, we give $O(4^k)$-time algorithms for Dominating Set, Independent Dominating Set, and Total Dominating Set. The main techniques used in this paper are a generalisation of fast subset convolution, as introduced by Bj\"orklund et al., now applied in the setting of graph decompositions and augmented such that multiple states and multiple ranks can be used. Recently, Lokshtanov et al. have shown that some of the algorithms obtained in this paper have running times in which the base in the exponents is optimal, unless the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis fails.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

The Fine Structure of Preferential Attachment Graphs I: Somewhere-Denseness

Preferential attachment graphs are random graphs designed to mimic properties of typical real world networks. They are constructed by a random process that iteratively adds vertices and attaches them preferentially to vertices that already have high degree. We use improved concentration bounds for vertex degrees to show that preferential attachment graphs contain asymptotically almost surely (a.a.s.) a one-subdivided clique of size at least $(\log n)^{1/4}$. Therefore, preferential attachment graphs are a.a.s somewhere-dense. This implies that algorithmic techniques developed for sparse graphs are not directly applicable to them. The concentration bounds state: Assuming that the exact degree $d$ of a fixed vertex (or set of vertices) at some early time $t$ of the random process is known, the probability distribution of $d$ is sharply concentrated as the random process evolves if and only if $d$ is large at time $t$.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2017

Local Structure Theorems for Erdos Renyi Graphs and their Algorithmic Application

We analyze some local properties of sparse Erdos-Renyi graphs, where $d(n)/n$ is the edge probability. In particular we study the behavior of very short paths. For $d(n)=n^{o(1)}$ we show that $G(n,d(n)/n)$ has asymptotically almost surely (a.a.s.~) bounded local treewidth and therefore is a.a.s.~nowhere dense. We also discover a new and simpler proof that $G(n,d/n)$ has a.a.s.~bounded expansion for constant~$d$. The local structure of sparse Erdos-Renyi Gaphs is very special: The $r$-neighborhood of a vertex is a tree with some additional edges, where the probability that there are $m$ additional edges decreases with~$m$. This implies efficient algorithms for subgraph isomorphism, in particular for finding subgraphs with small diameter. Finally we note that experiments suggest that preferential attachment graphs might have similar properties after deleting a small number of vertices.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2016

Width, depth and space

The width measure treedepth, also known as vertex ranking, centered coloring and elimination tree height, is a well-established notion which has recently seen a resurgence of interest. Since graphs of bounded treedepth are more restricted than graphs of bounded tree- or pathwidth, we are interested in the algorithmic utility of this additional structure. On the negative side, we show that every dynamic programming algorithm on treedepth decompositions of depth~$t$ cannot solve Dominating Set with $O((3-\epsilon)^t \cdot \log n)$ space for any $\epsilon > 0$. This result implies the same space lower bound for dynamic programming algorithms on tree and path decompositions. We supplement this result by showing a space lower bound of $O((3-\epsilon)^t \cdot \log n)$ for 3-Coloring and $O((2-\epsilon)^t \cdot \log n)$ for Vertex Cover. This formalizes the common intuition that dynamic programming algorithms on graph decompositions necessarily consume a lot of space and complements known results of the time-complexity of problems restricted to low-treewidth classes. We then show that treedepth lends itself to the design of branching algorithms. This class of algorithms has in general distinct advantages over dynamic programming algorithms: a) They use less space than algorithms based on dynamic programming, b) they are easy to parallelize and c) they provide possible solutions before terminating. Specifically, we design for Dominating Set a pure branching algorithm that runs in time $t^{O(t^2)}\cdot n$ and uses space $O(t^3 \log t + t \log n)$ and a hybrid of branching and dynamic programming that achieves a running time of $O(3^t \log t \cdot n)$ while using $O(2^t t \log t + t \log n)$ space. Algorithms for 3-Coloring and Vertex Cover with space complexity $O(t \cdot \log n)$ and time complexity $O(3^t \cdot n)$ and $O(2^t\cdot n)$, respectively, are included for completeness.

cs.CC↗