Optimal Clustering with Dependent Costs in Bayesian Networks

Paul Pao-Yen Wu; Fabrizio Ruggeri; Kerrie Mengersen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2308.03970

Optimal Clustering with Dependent Costs in Bayesian Networks

Paul Pao-Yen Wu·Fabrizio Ruggeri·Kerrie Mengersen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Background: Clustering of nodes in Bayesian Networks (BNs) and related graphical models such as Dynamic BNs (DBNs) has been demonstrated to enhance computational efficiency and improve model learning. It typically involves partitioning the underlying Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) into cliques or optimising for some cost or criteria. Objectives: We focus on a critical but understudied aspect of optimal clustering involving cost dependency. This is where inference outcomes and hence clustering costs depend on both nodes within a cluster and the mapping of clusters that are connected by at least one arc. Methods: We propose a novel algorithm called Dependent Cluster MAPping (DCMAP) which can, given an arbitrary, positive cost function, iteratively and rapidly find near-optimal, then optimal cluster mappings. Results: DCMAP is shown analytically to be optimal in terms of finding all of the least cost cluster mapping solutions and with no more iterations than an equally informed algorithm. Demonstrated on a complex systems seagrass DBN with $9.91\times10^9$ and $1.51\times10^{21}$ possible cluster mappings for 25 and 50 node configurations, it took 856 and 1569 iterations on average to find the first optimal solution, respectively. Conclusions: The effectiveness of DCMAP enables future research in BN learning using optimisation, such as through enhancing computational efficiency or minimising entropy for learning. This is critically important as computation of marginal distributions or updating model parameters is NP-hard.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS stat.ML

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Paul Pao-Yen Wu, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Kerrie Mengersen. 2023-08-08. Optimal Clustering with Dependent Costs in Bayesian Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03970

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗