Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2308.11919

Validit\'e de la th\'eorie cin\'etique des gaz: au-del\`a de l'\'equation de Boltzmann [d'apr\`es T. Bodineau, I. Gallagher, L. Saint-Raymond, S. Simonella]

François Golse
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Obtaining a rigorous justification of the kinetic theory of gases from Newton's second law of dynamics for a large number of identical spheres interacting by elastic binary collisions, is a problem formulated by Hilbert in 1900 (Hilbert's 6th problem). In 1975, Lanford demonstrated the validity of the Boltzmann equation over a very short time interval, of the order of a fraction of the average time between two successive collisions experienced by the same particle. This result of Lanford can be interpreted as a kind of law of large numbers as the number of particles tends to infinity. This point of view raises several questions. First, the core of the argument used by Boltzmann to arrive at the equation bearing his name is the assumption that two particles about to collide are statistically almost independent. This suggests to examine the validity of this hypothesis by studying the dynamics of correlations between particles. On the other hand, the interpretation of the Boltzmann equation as a law of large numbers leads to study precisely the fluctuations of the phase space empirical measure of the particle system about its mean (whose evolution is described by the Boltzmann equation). A series of recent papers by T. Bodineau, I. Gallagher, L. Saint-Raymond and S. Simonella answers these various questions and allows going beyond the Boltzmann equation in the understanding of the kinetic theory of gases.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.APmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

François Golse. 2023-08-23. Validit\'e de la th\'eorie cin\'etique des gaz: au-del\`a de l'\'equation de Boltzmann [d'apr\`es T. Bodineau, I. Gallagher, L. Saint-Raymond, S. Simonella]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11919

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗